Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Case No. 452-96 <br /> 110 <br /> New Apostolic Church; 3025 County Road H <br /> September 18, 1996 <br /> Page 2 <br /> Conditional Use Permit: <br /> Resolution Recommending Denial(475-96) <br /> Resolution Recommending Approval(480-96) <br /> Development Review: <br /> Resolution Recommending Denial(476-96) <br /> Resolution Recommending Approval(481-96) <br /> (if conditional use permit approved) <br /> Site Plan and Landscape Plan(full size enclosed with packet) <br /> Drainage and Grading(full size enclosed with packet) <br /> Background: <br /> This report serves as a supplement to the staff report prepared for the Planning <br /> Commission meeting on September 4, 1996. It focuses on the changes which have been <br /> made in the applicant's proposal during and after discussion at that meeting. <br /> The property is located at 3025 County Road H. The New Apostolic Church is proposing • <br /> to build a 2,054 square foot church on a R-1 Single Family Residential Property. This <br /> request has been discussed at the Planning Commission meetings on July 24, August 7, <br /> August 21 and September 4. The meeting on August 7 was advertised as a public <br /> informational meeting. The meeting on September 18 has been advertised as a public <br /> hearing on the variance request. The plans being transmitted to the Planning Commission <br /> with this report have been revised since your meeting on September 4. <br /> The applicant's original request included three different types of approval: <br /> • a conditional use permit to allow construction of a church in the R-1 district [see <br /> Section 1106.04(1) and Section 1125.01(3) of the Zoning Code] <br /> • a development review [see Section 1006.06(2)] of the Municipal Code] <br /> • a variance allowing an encroachment of 5 feet into the required 35 foot front <br /> setback [see Section 1106.04(1) and Section 1125.02 of the Zoning Code] <br /> As noted earlier, the plans submitted for the Planning Commission's September 18 <br /> meeting do not require a setback variance and staff has assumed that the applicant has <br /> withdrawn this part of the request. The Planning Commission may want to open the <br /> public hearing on the variance application, since it was advertised, allow staff to explain <br /> why a variance is not now needed and have the applicant indicate whether they are <br /> withdrawing the application. If they withdraw the variance request, no public hearing on <br /> 1110 <br /> the variance request is needed. <br />