My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-04-1996
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
09-04-1996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2018 3:20:53 PM
Creation date
7/31/2018 2:08:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
9/4/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
147
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Case No. 452-96 <br /> New Apostolic Church; 3025 County Road H <br /> September 18, 1996 <br /> Page 9 <br /> characterized by deep, oversized lots and mature trees. Because the lots are large, the <br /> typical building coverage is low. The applicant's proposal would be a more intensive use <br /> of the lot than is typical of the neighborhood. <br /> The applicant has testified of the difficulty encountered by his clients in trying to find <br /> vacant property which would allow development of a church near to where most of the <br /> church members live. The church congregation includes members who live in the Mounds <br /> View area. There appears to be a demonstrated need for the use. <br /> Criteria from Section 1125.01: Amendments and Conditional Uses <br /> Section 1125.01 describes the purpose of conditional use permits, and includes criteria for <br /> granting these permits. <br /> • Purpose: The purpose of a conditional use permit is to provide the City with a reasonable degree of <br /> discretion in determining the suitability of certain designated uses upon the general welfare,public <br /> health and safety. <br /> At your August 21 meeting, the Planning Commission asked staff to discuss with the City <br /> Attorney the degree of discretion which the Planning Commission has in making its <br /> recommendation on a conditional use permit. City Attorney Bob Long has provided a <br /> letter dated August 29, 1996 which discusses this issue. It states in part: <br /> "The Planning Commission (serving either as the Planning Commission or as the Board) <br /> and the City Council retain full discretion to grant or deny a conditional use permit or <br /> variance request based on whether or not the CUP or variance request meet the criteria as <br /> set forth in the Code. The Planning Commission and City Council are not in any way <br /> obligated by the actions or undertakings of a(n) applicant prior to a public hearing on a <br /> conditional us= ._ ••. - : . • - nor is either body bound by the-earlier—communications <br /> between city staff and an applicant. The only proper considerations for the Planning <br /> Commission or City Council to consider in granting or denying a conditional use permit <br /> request or variance request is whether such request meets all of the criteria set forth in the <br /> Code, taking into consideration the testimony of the applicant and the reports and <br /> recommendations of the City planning staff" (Copy attached.) <br /> Conditional uses are distinguished from permitted uses for a reason. These uses are <br /> subject to greater scrutiny because they have the potential for creating greater impacts <br /> than the permitted uses in a given district. The criteria for granting conditional permitsare <br /> intended to assess, in part, the suitability and compatibility of such uses with adjacent <br /> permitted uses. The criteria are noted below, and have been grouped to avoid repetitive <br /> 1110 discussion. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.