Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council June 27, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 18 <br /> <br /> 1 <br />Council Member Stigney called a point of order stating that a motion to table is not in order but a 2 <br />postponement would be. He asked if the resolution would include the $300.00 for the additional 3 <br />five-year warranty. 4 <br />Public Works Director Lee confirmed that the $300.00 would be included noting that he has two 5 <br />additional points to add to the resolution: one would be the $300.00 to extend the warranty and 6 <br />the other would be the $1200.00 to go through the other roof top units to make sure none of the 7 <br />others are in the same condition. 8 <br /> 9 <br />Mayor M arty asked if Public Works Director Lee could bring this back to Council after he has 10 <br />spoken with them on the estimate. He asked if this is a time sensitive issue noting that they are 11 <br />getting to the hottest time of the year. 12 <br /> 13 <br />Public Works Director Lee confirmed that it is getting time sensitive at this point. He stated that 14 <br />UHL has said they could work on it right away, as soon as they get the approval from Council. 15 <br />He stated that they could postpone the decision on this until July 11th but it would get pretty tight 16 <br />time wise if they go beyond that timeframe. 17 <br /> 18 <br />Council Member Thomas asked if they are willing to do a refit and new pricing. 19 <br /> 20 <br />Public Works Director Less stated that they could go back and discuss this with UHL noting that 21 <br />he is anticipating that they would come back stating that there are a lot of unknowns in doing this 22 <br />kind of work, which is why they gave the city this quote. He noted that the original quote did go 23 <br />from $5000 to $8000 for two days of work. He stated that the safest thing to do would be to 24 <br />approve this and possibly put a cap of $5500 to $5800.00. He stated that after they tear it apart to 25 <br />see what actually should be done and he could then come back on July 11th to update Council 26 <br />noting that they are basically committed at that point. 27 <br /> 28 <br />Council Member Thomas stated that the problem with that is if they have a team here working 29 <br />and they pull the team off the job and then have to bring them back again to complete the work 30 <br />that it would cost the city even more money. She expressed concerns stating that she does not 31 <br />like the numbers and feels that the quote is too high. 32 <br /> 33 <br />Mayor Marty agreed stating that it is getting to be the most critical time of the year to have air 34 <br />conditioning noting that he received several comments from people at the public hearing last 35 <br />week. He clarified with Public Director Lee that he has worked with UHL before and that they 36 <br />provided this quote because they weren’t really sure what they are getting into. 37 <br /> 38 <br />Public Works Director Lee stated that the city has had a long relationship with UHL and he does 39 <br />have a lot of trust with UHL based on the work they have done for the city in the past. He noted 40 <br />that another vendor could have come in with a lower quote and go over the quote. He explained 41 <br />that UHL was trying to give the bigger picture noting that they have been very honest and upfront 42 <br />with this quote and with the work they have done for the city in the past. 43 <br /> 44 <br />Council Member Stigney stated that if Public Works Director has a comfort level with UHL then 45