My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-02-1996
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
10-02-1996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2018 2:19:36 PM
Creation date
7/31/2018 2:18:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
10/2/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
UNAPPROVED <br /> Mounds View Planning Commission September 18, 1996 • <br /> Special Meeting Page 12 <br /> Apostolic Church to construct a church facility <br /> at 3025 County Road H, as amended. Director <br /> • Sheldon suggested to take the changes <br /> proposed in the hand-out and drop the first item. <br /> related to the Fire Department since the <br /> applicant had proposed a way to solve the <br /> emergencyaccess problem. <br /> Lynn Widseth, 3001 County Road H, wanted to <br /> know if the Planning Commission recommends <br /> denial and it goes to City Council, what will they <br /> do with the information? Chair Peterson <br /> replied by saying that one of the Planning <br /> Commission's main jobs is to make sure that all <br /> issues are explored. Director Sheldon also <br /> replied by saying that the City Council receives <br /> a staff report along with the Planning . <br /> Commission's recommendation and a public <br /> hearing will be held by the City Council and • <br /> they will then make their decision. <br /> Commission Brasaemle explained that this <br /> decision has nothing to do with the church, its <br /> membership or his feelings toward the church. <br /> He was recommending denial because of lot <br /> size and the fact that the he believes it to be an <br /> overdevelopment of the lot that is designated <br /> R-1, low density use and he concurs with <br /> Staffs recommendation that the height and size <br /> of the building do not fit the surrounding area. <br /> He also expressed that he shares the concerns <br /> with the surrounding property owners regarding <br /> the parking lot and its effect on property values, <br /> but stated that he understands property values <br /> tend not to decrease when there is a church <br /> built in a neighborhood. He stated that the <br /> parking lot adds an extraordinary circumstance, <br /> and that if this were a one acre lot and there <br /> were more buffer, he would have no problem <br /> with the request. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.