My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-02-1996
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
10-02-1996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2018 2:19:36 PM
Creation date
7/31/2018 2:18:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
10/2/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
UNAPPROVED <br /> Mounds View Planning Commission September 18, 1996 <br /> • Special Meeting Page 13 <br /> Commissioner Brooks was concerned with how <br /> the church fits in with the character of the <br /> surrounding area. <br /> Commissioner Miller stated that she would <br /> have to go against this denial because some of <br /> the items are fairly subjective and she <br /> questioned what is adequate and added that <br /> what is adequate for one person may not be <br /> adequate for another. She believes that this is <br /> a situation where people like things the way <br /> they are and don't what to change, but she <br /> feels if a property belongs to someone they <br /> should have the opportunity to use that <br /> property. She believes that the applicant has <br /> gone through the criteria and they have met the <br /> parking requirements and added more buffering <br /> than the Code requires. <br /> • Commissioner Johnston stated he believes that <br /> it is too intense of a use for the lot and would <br /> have no problem with a smaller church. <br /> Commissioner Obert disagreed with the denial <br /> on the basis that the applicant has done <br /> everything that the City has asked of them and <br /> believes that they have actually become more <br /> accommodating. He felt there has been some <br /> precedent already set in Mounds View as far as <br /> the property of other churches. He believes <br /> something else can be done yet to modify the <br /> buffering issue and suggested that more <br /> research be done. <br /> Commissioner Stevenson does not want people <br /> driving into Mounds View asking how did they <br /> ever allow a church development like that in <br /> Mounds View? He believes there is enough <br /> things here that will definitely make him vote for <br /> denial of the request. <br /> • <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.