Laserfiche WebLink
' • Ms. Pamela Sheldon <br /> September 8, 1996 <br /> Page Two <br /> • <br /> f. I can see no reason why the approval of the variance would in any <br /> way be materially detrimental to the purpose of the zoning code or to <br /> other property in the same zone. <br /> g. The proposed variance will not impair an adequate supply of light or <br /> - -air to the adjacent property. The porch would be barely visible to the <br /> neighbors directly behind my property, and only then through an existing <br /> row of mature trees and across their very deep backyards, making it <br /> almost invisible to the neighboring home owners. Since the porch is <br /> at the rear of my home, away from the street, no congestion would occur. <br /> There would be no increase in the danger of fire or public safety since <br /> the proposed porch is well away from the neighboring homes. Having a <br /> well designed and well built porch would only add to the property values <br /> within the neighborhood, .:.not diminish or impair them. <br /> In closing, I appreciate the Planning Commission taking my request for <br /> a variance into consideration. I trust that I have provided you with <br /> clear and accurate information as to why I feel that a denial of my <br /> request-would create an undue hardship, as well as a ,practical difficulty, <br /> in the future use and enjoyment of my home and property. <br /> Shouldl you desire further information or clarification, please feel free <br /> to contact me. <br /> • Sincerely, <br /> Ronald L. Gardner <br /> • <br />