Laserfiche WebLink
- Apr-11-97 09: 53A Howard Sheldon 1-714-779-6612 P-02 <br /> SPlanning Commission <br /> 471-97: O'Neil Property <br /> April 10, 1997 <br /> Page 7 <br /> Daily Daily PM Peak PM Peak <br /> Volume Volume Streets Generator <br /> (wo project)(1) (with project) <br /> Highway 10 40,000 <br /> * south of project entrance 41,518 +143 +225 <br /> * north of project entrance 42,121 +191 +285 <br /> County Road H2 <br /> * Quincy to Hwy 10 2,450 N/A N/A N/A <br /> * Hwy 10 to Long Lake Rd 3,900 4,320 +40 +72 <br /> * Long Lake Rd west 4,600 4,966 +34 +55 <br /> Long Lake Rd <br /> * CR H to CR 112 3,200 3,410 +20 +32 <br /> * CR H2 to Highway 10 2,700 3,120 +38 +98 <br /> * Highway 10 to CR I 2,750 N/A N/A N/A <br /> .110 Numbers taken from original traffic study dated 3-12-97. <br /> This information shows that number of trips during the peak hour for the theater is higher than <br /> the number generated during the peak hour for the surrounding street system. Daily volumes <br /> have been noted in order to keep the peak hour trip count in perspective. Discounting Highway <br /> 10, the data shows 12 more trips on Long Lake Road from CR H to CR H2 to 60 more trips <br /> on Long Lake Road from CR H2 to Highway 10, when using the generator peak as opposed t• <br /> the street peak. The total trips added during the peak for the theater ranges from 32 to 98 trips. <br /> It may be helpful to picture how many trips that is per minute these numbers represent. Thirty <br /> two trips is 1 trip every 2 minutes; 98 trips is approximately 1 trip every 38 seconds. The trips <br /> will come in bunches due to the nature of the generator, but the added volume is very low. <br /> The traffic during the peak hour for the theater will not cause the level of service at the <br /> surrounding intersections to deteriorate. <br /> * Refinement of the assignment of site-generated trips to the street system, with particular <br /> attention to added trips on Long Lake Road as a connector to Highway 694. <br /> The trip assignment of site-generated trips to the street system was originally based on the <br /> distribution of existing traffic volumes on the streets. After questions were raised at the <br /> Planning Commission meeting regarding the distribution, the traffic consultant has refined the <br /> • assumed direction of travel based on the Metropolitan Council's regional travel forecasting <br /> model. The results of this revision are shown in Figure 1. Planning Commission may want to <br />