Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission April 2, 1997 • <br /> Regular Meeting Page 8 <br /> was put into place in order to put some controls on what happens in the wetlands. <br /> He recalled that in the past some development had been allowed in the buffer, but <br /> that it was primarily intended to be a buffer and not for intensive devel rnent. <br /> Commissioner Stevenson added that the reason for the b,i ,er w‘ifib make sure <br /> any development proposed for the wetland was re riewed. ,.; sioners Miller <br /> and Johnston expressed their concern with the< frenc ; ` d delineations, <br /> shown on the maps for 1988 and 1992 and a if 1997 � : �:A e different.' <br /> Mr. Black indicated that he believed the 19924: lineatiot �•uld " � abl-. <br /> Rice Creek Watershed District because it w r3' of mnafhan five ' `$ .. <br /> Black asked if he could receive a copy of a l$ „ .;, bity received fr:` :�`; rmy <br /> Corps of Engineers regarding this issue. He ir. € Ertiat if the Army Corps of <br /> Engineers is suggesting that a new delineatio : it tey would have it looked <br /> at and verified. Commissioner Brasaemleitikprea,010q does prefer to see <br /> buildings versus parking lots constructed.: :: .e buffer ib' use of the <br /> associated problems with run-off. He:: ssed soincern with the <br /> location of the proposed NURP N, euhat` � 3` ` to-Off 'Y` ram in the wetland <br /> and where in the upland could itlig move r fl r <br /> > <br /> • <br /> 'ti`'�T M1iii?ii::?iii:hiiti4�,,�•` <br /> IOW <br /> Chuck Plow, Project Ener, repoded that information he has regarding the • <br /> NURP pond indicates tht not Ole wetlal, yet if they were not able to use it <br /> as a NURP pond area `vother NWP pond n the site would satisfy ponding <br /> "'" <br /> requirements. `' .:,.:..: <br /> Barb enzy, ` a Lane; expressed her concern with the number of gas <br /> staf ; car waunds View and inquired if the senior complexes in <br /> the a 4timAping fii*Mal `> <br /> Ju liet;1i3 achild.Avenue, expressed his concern with the NURP pond <br /> ifitng-too-ctos441010derground-parking-for-the-proposed-senior-building hair <br /> 4 Peterson repliehe believes the elevation to be similar to the ground floor <br /> 44 <br /> ;.,� elevation at Siler Like Pointe on the south side of the project which also has <br /> 4punder round <br /> g r;v .ng. Mr. Miller also expressed his concern with the traffic flow on <br /> , the corner of Over Lake Road and Highway 10. <br /> J) , Transportation Planner for Biko Associates, addressed the traffic <br /> '\a�k?sa 'tgreickin concerns bybriefly summarizing the plan and the results of the traffic <br /> � ,,�"� 9 Y 9 <br /> study that was conducted for this proposed project. He described the design of the <br /> loop road and driveway access to the gas station/car wash facility and indicated <br /> that the County Engineer, Dan Solar's, opinion was that the loop road is important <br /> to the project. He informed the Commission that a sign would be placed on the site • <br /> to inform car wash traffic to not block the driveway and that on-site staff for the car <br />