04-16-1997 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

• Mounds View Planning Commission April 2, 1997 Regular Meeting Page 7 come forward with a PUD package, because of the efforts from the property owners and investors to put it together, and he expressed that it is important that each elment of the PUD is approved as a total package. He comme • j'>. that the ; applicant is not prepared to move on with any one single ite •f thN D. Commissioner Brooks also expressed her concern, with theK., k: s ion between the Amoco Station across the street and the newcility. tBnsa: :.explained that there is a market of 34-55 percent that is not y tddresse ,. x�: ., cility coul.. go in without infringing on the existing market commis `finer. . :' ' ':�.n .,:::„ expressed his concern with the number of g .tatior at have cl ; �.. . $ he last twenty years. Mt,.� �:%:ti\��h�titi�.iii�i. Mas 3:�.t�,.fir..'•...... JoAnn Myers, 2624 Lake Court Drive, aske ' wn Commission the definition of a B-2 zone and how this development act the homes on the south side of the project. Chair Peterson<listed vaributimetjat are allowed in a B-2 district and briefly explained that j ' M't:",rwill take ' ) on the south end of the project. Mr. Black pointed out, Sete d ,,and a sses to the project are proposed to be. ArE1110041 `11i"```' r„ • Rose Nejedly, 2701 Coun toad 1,;`227, inq red if all the trees on the site would be removed. Mr. . l t indic d that We a would be some impact on the existing vegetation but fpiot have= detail tplan with him. He indicated that they would be providing.a ve:i detaile 1a ng plan at the development stage. Ms. N asked if; ,.:,.`e: ie wetly 1 �be dredged out. Mr. Black indicated that t` e is to}``"$`� ``` `' ut, butf iat there were a number of agencies that would zix rzz<z rzzz zz z- . z«<;z�.,.z A. hav0 ':' nsulte v � oing so. Mr. Black added that by dredging the wetlarft v....suld as614ve oing standing water. H :Ru r,S Lake Court Drive inquired about the 100 foot wetland .At fer-and-afse :d h s-concem-with-the-poss-ibility-of-the-oils,, salts,, soaps; etc., due to incr >surface paving, from the gas station and car washes entering• the weDirector Sheldon explained that the wetland ordinance sets ; k out that the 1 Q400t width that must be identified around all designated wetlands z z., SS .. .z<z:. zza. but that the qtiiinance allows some construction within the buffer area with ��. �dministr review. She added that certain other activities would require ' .fa�=:°`'�t ommission and City Council review. She explained that Staff is asking .':-,*,44014i,degree the encroachment should be allowed. She explained that the City Engineer would review the plans to assure they have designed the drainage system and ponding so that the contaminants do not enter the wetland. Chair Peterson added that there has been strong public support in Mounds View for • wetland preservation and the purpose of the Wetland Ordinance is to make sure the wetlands are observed and not degraded. He added that the wetland buffer