04-16-1997 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mounds View Planning Commission April 2, 1997 • Special Agenda Meeting Page 6 Commissioner Miller inquired if there would be access to the theater parking from Donatelle's. Mr. Smith indicated that they are very open to the idea, either by walkway or vehicle, and indicated that he has talked with Mr. Donate! = ho is also open to the idea. ; , ; ` Tom Ernster, 2504 County Road H2, commeni ;; at thisst s.:= is the best possible for this particular use and does not w,a the site * v• from wh.: had been presented. iir ;, w µ ti " ,,,,-Ir- .? Chair Peterson commented that the Police >�_.int has recom T:• ozv. hat the City try to get a full signalized intersection' laps realign Edgewood Drive to join the site at a 90 degree angle. Mr. Smith added that the study would probably indicate that the project could be Bane without< ..` gpal. However, they would prefer to have one installed. He add..ed;that theyy` t City to work with MnDOT but that theyneed a decisio ;, �� er>,� �� ir the CtWt`hat they can move forward with the development stage #`or r`t eed it ;working with MnDOT. ir IrilLiatille A resident indicated that he like the th !er pr:...'` does not like the traffic situation. III Chair Peterson suggeitigi that ttego ove,~ e issues that still need discussion. They,commented thai tie Compr n s P is out-of-date and wondered if it sh< e amerglak indicat does not think we could do much better ::Y::``.:.a:4�\.. �F.......:. :2:..:..� fir, Yrs, z. t::•:i":'�\.\ :;....t tli < < A for `"`' € =lommisfd`ner Stevenson commented that he has been onori%110104ftay 10 for the last five years and they saw the only devel6pMeAtiltpr this iltitiggliitvbecause of the mix of zones. He added that the Comp:an nee to be r e oiin Ernster,- .o • Road H2, indicated- that he has looked_at_theold Lomp Plan and A:5 ggest that the area wasn't to be high impact development. AV ii< r am ,—,..: Commissionzi e Brasaemle added that certainly a PUD will give the City more pvt control as fs development. Commissioner Obert asked what happens when 11` �r tithe Comp Jan is redone. Would they take into account the possibilty for rezoning 1s0.1100 ty and would it remain the current zoning even if it is developed as a ti ' He also inquired if it is approved as a PUD, would it be coordinated into the ' ;iiiiia.� l revised Comp Plan as such? Director Sheldon responded by saying that the i existing zoning and the Comp Plan do not match. The Planning Commission could proceed to make a recommendation on the zoning alone and not touch the Comp Plan. She added that what regulates the use of the parcel is the zoning and • Minnesota does not have a requirement that you have to have consistency