04-16-1997 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

• Mounds View Planning Commission April 2, 1997 Special Agenda Meeting Page 7 between your Comp Plan and your zoning. The zoning could be changed to accommodate the project and it would still not match the Comp Plan. She is not, however, advising that be done. She expressed that she thought the > 'mp Plan that now indicates residential is different enough from the ext ting ; proposed zoning, and that we should finally make a decision regardiati <.a`h` a Comp Plan should say. Commissioner Obert asked if the: tor4';pr.::. miss eded �Efgth the applicant's PUD proposal, would it then be do !Director - {,.> i -gid tha w the property would no longer be vacant and would not be: `` ba =:� _ add z " zx z " 2z that the state law states that zoning takes prudent{ mer comp pt=: $ , -.y zi{{.t. 3. yt,` xk??h eat• are different. She commented that it would e '--.:,.�:. to Staff if they• =. ; +ut on whether or not the Commission felt that there soh room on this parcel for commercial activity. The Planning Commission v :et the Comp Plan should be changed and that rezoning to a PUD cot be used € >tQoi to control and €Emi=t' negative impact for the property. }r`�'u`""`'?''?r"'" Agin- �:cz,-:.:��:�K{zxx!! ,ENONS VW* lsr The Commission briefly discussed:{011 . nalizatioi and to align t-: gewuo' Drive with the site. The Planni Commi ora .;. posed to this. Mr Srnith v ,`}::iv�ivv;:!{lvtiti.•.!itY:{j:•:�}•4 asked that the Planning Comm t sion m*ex��f7ja d € ;� n their propsal pour b • receiving a decision from M DT. Commissioner Brasaemle requested that they N. receive some assurance.:•MnD that if tk proposal went through, the City would continue working< , .jet theA nal put it Mr. Smith brought up the resolution from. DC remindirmth rtommis c> EDC recommended approve`; of th* pr-." However,,` ey wanted *OW work with the Developer to seek a signal \\,,, Parkirtt m asemen s t dscaping and the buffer between the residents on Count R were briefly;discussed. Mr. Ernster expressed some of the concerns•of ��d nts a County Road H2 about screening, the overall ndscaping, a =appearance of the-proposed-fence. He commented that-the y. ; `residents wanteep property values as high as possible. Mr. Smith replied 4,4 that he City wo , control the fence design during the development stage. Commissionerbrasaemle added that the residents would have an opportunity to `s,, comment att., Development stage. Director Sheldon advised the Planning , µ !�ommiss ?ghat they could defer the landscaping issue and meet with the rood to come up with the most acceptable combination. A resident inquired if the homes along County Road H2 that were purchased by Jay Anthony would be rezoned. The Commission responded that they would remain residential. •