My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-16-1997
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
04-16-1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2018 5:19:35 AM
Creation date
8/1/2018 4:51:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
4/16/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
104
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission April 2, 1997 • <br /> Special Agenda Meeting Page 8 <br /> The Commission went on to briefly discuss the wetland buffer and encroachment of <br /> the project into the buffer and they indicated that this is not an issue. <br /> .a <br /> Chair Peterson inquired about reconstruction of County Ro H2.03 cessary. <br /> Director Sheldon responded that they do not expect that the e;'e f traffic would <br /> .,t<; ;42222:41,`.2222?22`�:�, <br /> trigger reconstruction. A resident expressed histcocem wt €p€ • for <br /> reconstruction due to increased traffic flows fa 'til's type of•�� .=Kected 0 <br /> Sheldon informed the Commission that there. re plans f.,o u ou ';',1001412 2 to. :_ . <br /> reconstructed in the year 2000. $y ` <br /> •The Commission talked briefly about installing> islk on County Road f2 if the <br /> increased traffic, as a result of this project, posed 04ti.: risk to pedestrians, but <br /> agreed that the impact would probably be insignificantcontinued with their <br /> discussion regarding sidewalks along Highway 10, trail , zand installing a <br /> boardwalk around the wetland. Mr. S ` ented th mi Jay Anth : <br /> provided a letter to the City indicating>A i'at € ling to irk with the City <br /> regarding trails and walkways. ,erector S :eldo Olhe Commission MO, the <br /> City has existing wetland credi ''from the golf ciconstruction that possriy <br /> t into the wetland, but they would <br /> need to find out if this proliVtWou100 a priorli use for the credits. <br /> 40^222ta. �w22xtt .., <br /> �222tt2„2,, <br /> The Commission decide that thus a 'sue would be dealt with ata Fater date. <br /> ` �_:,, :e • e i eet the sign criteria and added that they <br /> reasstn that tF <br /> <w ng ton < `t onument"sign with a reader board showing movies and <br /> starting#1 ' . .�.r,.. :ttlttl<:t <br /> z`ti?ii i ;w iz`??` s`�c ttzt tt :ttll , <br /> ChairP ii t nclude <t t the Planning Commission is in favor of what has <br /> be200:04Sdeftikt Millet no'action would be taken this evening since it was a <br /> , tt'cussion mem' <br /> .asked the Commission-whatwas-theirgenera' feeling and <br /> ;direction of this�`".`:'e <br /> s. <br /> Mr. Smith asl if the Commission could take a straw vote so that he has an idea <br /> 2,x <br /> of their feeling regarding the project. Other than traffic concerns that need to be <br /> �?,, orked otand given other potential uses for the site, all Commissioners <br /> �`\,"',`\,Y`�i 2.4`.'.;,,1. tt...�.:.L,} <br /> ssi 2`expressed'that they are in favor of the project. <br /> .fit Y2�,,\,,,2 <br /> zw • <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.