05-21-1997 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

• Mounds View Planning Commission April 2, 1997 • Regular Meeting Page 8 was put into place in order to put some controls on what happens in the wetlands. He recalled that in the past some development had been allowed in the buffer, but that it was primarily intended to be a buffer and not for intensive development. Commissioner Stevenson added that the reason for the biker w4:10 make sure any development proposed for the wetland was reviewed. 4. ssioners Miller ;YxY>::YYY and Johnston expressed their concern with the erence�:� # �.:d delineations shown on the maps for 1988 and 1992 and asked"if 1997 #06.4000:140 different:<' Mr. Black indicated that he believed the I992flineatiot : uldx able,Yt `Y;4 Rice Creek Watershed District because it w of mo•Yhan fiveY�YY `Y:`. d, Mr. 4,.h atfY`r� i..:.x:,Y.7�•Y:.: :Jy`: Black asked if he could receive a copy of a letter 4'tity received frat }Army Corps of Engineers regarding this issue. He iri< at if the Army Corps of YYi2YYYYYY`.YYY4iYY Engineers is suggesting that a new delineatio a ).t ey would have it looked at and verified. Commissioner Brasaemle(.4pres$0.0042,does prefer to see buildings versus parking lots constructed,Yine buffer' because of the • `•YieiiYYzri`�n ,,y,. associated problems with run-off. Hpiggg eipr,essed sots Ohcem with the location of the proposed NURP (N; rt -Off P; gram) in the wetland and where in the upland could it be movedijfi } v :0* 1410.60W Chuck Plow, Project En 1 ter, repc� �d that t :e information he has regarding the 410 NURP pond indicates that 'not glifie wetla 'Y', yet if they were not able to use it as a NURP pond area,itie other NP poen the site would satisfy ponding requ' ements. ` •:ri`•'4. ,.�� ,t `v. ,\�}>,�.•`.,.`i..:i2.:i\Y:Yy4Y`�� ANLt..��}: .�:Y}::4•:•:v: �•�•:h ` y'v'::�v vtv:" B . enzy,Yv ` . , e Lane; expressed her concern with the number of gas stay'"n d.,car wa mounds View and inquired if the senior complexes in the areabeing fill `w $><.r `.„xwY Yr,;2sY>.::;Y;YY;<,s. nY.•<Y<zYYiY:Y?" ,.�Lti�Yn` YYLYY,L;!�YYYY ~` Y`} Jim teitlIK.child''Avenue, expressed his concern with the NURP pond ilithg-too-ctos:ftittabadergruund parking for the proposed seniorbuitding. Chair <Peterson repliie believes the elevation to be similar to the ground floor elevation at Silver Lake Pointe on the south side of the project which also has 01:fi underground eking. Mr. Miller also expressed his concern with the traffic flow on it the corner of ilver Lake Road and Highway 10. Y`KY;YYYYYYYY 040 h, Transportation Planner for Biko Associates, addressed the traffic yAx µ stacking concerns by briefly summarizing the plan and the results of the traffic study that was conducted for this proposed project. He described the design of the loop road and driveway access to the gas station/car wash facility and indicated that the County Engineer, Dan Solar's, opinion was that the loop road is important to the project. He informed the Commission that a sign would be placed on the site to inform car wash traffic to not block the driveway and that on-site staff for the car