Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission April 2, 1997 <br /> • Regular Meeting Page 7 <br /> come forward with a PUD package, because of the efforts from the property <br /> owners and investors to put it together, and he expressed that it is important that <br /> each elment of the PUD is approved as a total package. He commented that the <br /> applicant is not prepared to move on with any one single item pf thOUD. <br /> Commissioner Brooks also expressed her concerg with thgt*LO titian between <br /> the Amoco Station across the street and the ne*Toility. 400010‘explained thats, ' <br /> there is a market of 34-55 percent that is not 4.1idressectiokti4f)ecility could" <br /> go in without infringing on the existing markeVitommi§g.her*06101..„4, <br /> expressed his concern with the number of gOiVatior*That have dosed isithOthe <br /> last twenty twenty years. <br /> ipkgRokm, <br /> Imwook. <br /> JoAnn Myers, 2624 Lake Court Drive, askepitattm Commission the <br /> definition of a B-2 zone and how this develoiibent iiiqzactirOgct the homes on the <br /> south side of the project. Chair Peters9aNd vario :itsotat are allowed in a <br /> B-2 district and briefly explained that,WWL. will take 140 on the south end of <br /> the project. Mr. Black pointed out gifigfd'1010.40 . and accesses to the project are <br /> proposed to be. AW <br /> 0, .m.ob.141‘.,„,,,i,:ff <br /> P lasi.SW <br /> • Rose Nejedly, 2701 County Road It#227, inquired if all the trees on the site <br /> - . .,, <br /> would be removed. Mr."tic indicApd that tf*se would be some impact on the <br /> existing vegetation but i0}:hot ha*" detailed ijlan with him. He indicated that they <br /> wouk be providin%,:v0detailefg '''''' plan at the development stage. Ms. <br /> N 7asked itaMik, e wetli000ir.e dredged out Mr. Black indicated that <br /> tileg,p is taldiiterout, butt= there were a number of agencies that would <br /> t <br /> hPvitattikonsulfettO*oing so. Mr. Black added that by dredging the <br /> ,,..,.m...z.:.,..,e.::..,s:i.os. \., <br /> wetlarIVROMpuld adenfli.tgoing standing water. <br /> '''.411110 <br /> Hqopt 2629Rtid§(04Lakitourt Drive, inquired about the 100 foot wetland <br /> differ and als*vt*ti his concern with the_p_o_ssibility_of_the_oils,salts,soaps, <br /> .AlsAtc., due to increase surface paving, from the gas station and car washes <br /> ,fiar entering the wetiOnd: Director Sheldon explained that the wetland ordinance sets <br /> ..,.: :- <br /> mzzik out that the 100 foot width that must be identified around all designated wetlands <br /> but that the ;0inance allows some construction within the buffer area with <br /> bkoitgp,Tini%*b review. She added that certain other activities would require <br /> lingtW1-eommission and City Council review. She explained that Staff is asking <br /> laip,:1:0degree the encroachment should be allowed. She explained that the City <br /> Engineer would review the plans to assure they have designed the drainage <br /> system and ponding so that the contaminants do not enter the wetland. Chair <br /> Peterson added that there has been strong public support in Mounds View for <br /> wetland preservation and the purpose of the Wetland Ordinance is to make sure <br /> • the wetlands are observed and not degraded. He added that the wetland buffer <br />