Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission April 16, 1997II <br /> Special Meeting Page 2 <br /> 5. Consideration of Resolution No. 504-97 Regarding Modification to the Project <br /> Plan for the Mounds View Economic Development Project and Establishment <br /> of Tax Increment Financing District No. 4 (Redevelopment) <br /> tiY2k"'.k t}}.}:'fix <br /> Community Development Director Sheldon expla. thatflsvre west was before <br /> the Planning Commission because of a State » requirer9,< k >continued bya <br /> explaining that the City is proposing to form .a�*Attax in einem' h y <br /> dis <br /> called District No. 4 which would include the:,.; 1 •ertyytere the Be xl ted. <br /> She explained that the City has areas where m: :'{ 'om tax increme }icing <br /> can be spent and that the City has three distWet:P h tax increment finance <br /> district money is produced and this would be e Q tact. She indicated that <br /> the Planning Commission is being asked to' term ` het:00Kor not the formation <br /> of this district and the addition of the inco .'tream i vrall development <br /> plan for Mounds View is consistent wti! ° • rehensil:an. She added that <br /> ,�ks�w�z�,�Y.t.�• YYa Y i.kkkt <br /> the reason for forming this district. 061* increrneT it created by V.B. Diggs <br /> and use that increment to help I:2* race the om{���u}i ,rater project. She <br /> explained that part of theprojectwill in91.(t V.`' }� gs which is a private <br /> business and that this bus "'` III <br /> ids is ex-.acted to Buse the property to increase in <br /> property value. It will co . . . to b i�tax-payer entity but the rest of the project <br /> 4�k.w� <br /> will not be since it is a • .s: c projct She iljfined the Commission that <br /> improvements that o `• be elig �� %. >of the tax increment include: <br /> Ems:,,,.: :�YY`E"`k Yk <br /> co € ction of t pq:: g lot, irit.W. ;:: of utilities, and renovation of the building. <br /> sotetika.ted thatt `• .ping Commission may want to add a paragraph to the <br /> re`s u t they 1 t,µ.,odification consistent with the Comprehensive Plan <br /> as fol1 :}}:}},<;kx<>t<>}:` creatikkk; zkv is <br /> aglik O } `J' tact No. 4 would allow the development of a <br /> private.: tnewhich w ri q,in turn, produce revenues to assist in the installation <br /> of public ir'�l }`.. n s anitrenovation of a building intended for a community <br /> ;.D'i'ner for Mout :: The Mounds View Comprehensive Plan has divided the <br /> . 4City into 12 plaViltitfitricts and the proposed TIF District No. 4 is in District No. <br /> a*Z. 1. The Comprehensive Plan envisions the creation of a city center where there will <br /> <'+ tttt be a strong, vice identifying community focal point in this district. This district is <br /> ::::::::::%•:4% AW <br /> LttM1==k�:kk intended to ( :ka mixture of commercial; public; low, medium and high density <br /> . <br /> .tk } tkk•. siden `aild open space uses. The proposed project is consistent with this <br /> : e�` Sie added that it is Staffs recommendation to adopt Resolution No: 504-97. <br /> Motion/Second: Brasaemle/Brooks to approve Resolution No. 504-97 as amended. <br /> Commissioner Brasaemle added that he thought this was a good idea for <br /> Mounds View. Commissioner Johnston inquired if there were 12 development . <br />