|
• Mounds View Planning Commission April 16, 1997
<br /> Special Meeting Page 3
<br /> districts in the City. Director Sheldon explained that there are 12 planning districts
<br /> in the Comprehensive Plan which are separate from the TIF districts.
<br /> Motion Carried: 6 ayes, 0 nays n`
<br /> ,10 %MR%
<br /> 6. r
<br /> . ,„ Ar
<br /> Planning Case No. 471-97mmos, .„:,,fir
<br /> • `k Y` Y:: r,{.Y;.,Y4„;
<br /> 2430 Highway 10 _ t ::x...>..•.;>x Y. r
<br /> V,h`± vii,.\•. 'P+ `,
<br /> Applicant: Anthony Properties Management, Inc. - ;��;;�,,L Y'�.
<br /> .w�•Y�zz*`�Y-
<br /> Request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment from, • e ' -.nsity Residential to
<br /> Mixed Use PUD Allowing Commercial and Office As, an"dt �`••`,,�'•�`.•�`._kig from B-1 and R-2 to
<br /> PUD to Allow Development of a 16-Screen Mo Yt'TYeeY'
<br /> P �('�,; :ater art�•��� �1,000 Square Foot
<br /> Office Buildings. `t,
<br /> a ter„:` k 1.,I.$7.
<br /> Mr. Wendell Smith and Mr. Jayy'Anthony 'epre t � he applicant, Anthony
<br /> .
<br /> Properties Mana ement In vere ent. ,,:c
<br /> ,.
<br /> Director Sheldon expl h d that Plan '• .. Commission has two actions
<br /> mend .§PS: % 4;Ps.
<br /> befog it; the pro ms c ; .,* - omprehensive plan and a request for
<br /> a,.; • ,:YY • g fromz...:„„,,4..,•:34.,.,... . R-2 to-� `;_ . ` commercial uses.
<br /> She=' ;kith the Y'` ' 0- ” : -nsive Plan amendment and indicated that the
<br /> City's f not ific procedures for Comp Plan amendments.
<br /> Shetaff created a set of criteria that the Planning Commission
<br /> cctOiruse‘idikilihrfike whether or not the designation on the property should be
<br /> Allianged. She ed that there have been a series of attempts to amend the
<br /> •t , Comp Plan and�;tiere has been a range of designations considered
<br /> . including highly commercial, mixed use, low and medium density residential,
<br /> ago._ k office park, comorate headquarters office, or town home. The decision before
<br /> uz ;lli Ythe Plannin ommission was whether to recommend to City Council to change
<br /> zzz z z%'\kY z x,
<br /> :}A`: µ# k m density residential designation to mixed use that would anticipate
<br /> ,,.�:YY„YYYYY.Y..:„:,,,: �: p
<br /> `'`Y`Y 'Y mmercial or residential uses. She read aloud the five goals noted on
<br /> :0E ges 2 and 3 of Resolution No. 502-97. She noted as a general comment that
<br /> this particular project and the Comp Plan amendment have raised several
<br /> important issues: One is whether or not you can introduce a fairly intense
<br /> commercial development onto a piece of land that is bordered by a major
<br /> • highway but also bordered by a low density single family neighborhood. Staff
<br /> proposed that the designation make it clear that a portion of the property is
<br />
|