My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-21-1997
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
05-21-1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2018 5:20:18 AM
Creation date
8/1/2018 5:05:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
5/21/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission April 16, 19971111 <br /> Special Meeting Page 6 <br /> Chair Peterson commented that the City is looking at a specific development <br /> request and a specific rezoning and removing any inconsistency in the Comp Plan. <br /> 410* <br /> Commissioner Johnston inquired when the Comp Plan need t " updated. <br /> Director Sheldon indicated that it needed to be tot Coue end of 1998. <br /> 411:10 lEhMr,*\The Planning Commission discussed some of;;" r concerw : Y, ording of gi V <br /> the proposed District 1 narrative. Director S Zion ex I d th din 42.YY,. <br /> Yi, •YYYY>' Y#Y..`;.i2`Y'tYk "�22`Ya. <br /> indicates what the City would like to achieve: that tre are mar I i ;;ways <br /> to implement it. She summarized the intentionY f the 'ording, explain at once <br /> the City receives a development request, the' `` •is to make sure that <br /> sidewalks get constructed that connect into tl "I �`Y`• r t system. <br /> Mr. Anthony requested that the language. softened thatstates, "... development <br /> should include provisions for dedicaticz : " to perh'at ...consideration <br /> should be given to dedication of land* ` tinted to at a developer could <br /> have a situation where you could h of dedicate - Peterson responded by <br /> saying that the language doesey, "sho td inclu <br /> "` ` <br /> it doesn't say "must <br /> i `y } riaincluden. i ; . <br /> Am <br /> hYti <br /> Director Sheldon sugg• <br /> �YYkY.``^�f t Y 1Y <br /> d a rev relate `o general use patterns to say that <br /> rim <br /> "corercial and medium densitts, f :`should be located in proximity to <br /> Hi9a10 . 5. cicall � <br /> n s .,;Q ;medium density be changed to higher <br /> density: ccause . , '`` not feell is appropriate to place single family houses <br /> 'NAM Naitiezt <br /> It was.tt gi , us of tfloillanning Commission to leave in the wording proposed <br /> forDistrict" > ,ia d that they could make any necessary revisions when they <br /> 'datet e o <br /> i .: <br /> mtlici <br /> Men/Carried: Steveroriirasaemle to adopt Resolution No. 502-97 entitled, <br /> "Resolution Recommending Approval of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment from Medium <br /> Density Residential:t ''t <br /> Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (PUD) for the O'Neil <br /> 2430 w <br /> say 10; Planning Case No. 471-97", including Exhibit 2 as amended. <br /> i `>Y YYYY>it:t t <br /> IV bel:. ..,. Y;>.. d: 6 ayes, 0 nays <br /> Director Sheldon continued with the second part of the request relating to rezoning <br /> and reviewed the Staff report dated April 10, 1997. She began by explaining that <br /> this request is for rezoning of the O'Neil property from B-1 and R-2 to PUD for • <br /> commercial purposes. She briefly reviewed the Staff Report which summarized the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.