05-21-1997 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

• Mounds View Planning Commission April 16, 1997 Special Meeting Page 5 Chair Peterson commented that the proposed changes are consistent with past reviews of the Planning Commission. • . Commissioner Brooks commented that she felt the rovis'$.s a for P dedication of land for trail systems and revisions t the de--".•••:�lp ref District 1 of ca;,, #iii?`:r.' 'iiialoud. the Comp Plan are necessary. Director Sheldor�� d the`i ` • • ' +,A�.,x,` +fir #::?�, kis`: c. L`k``•Y2`..h."Yi `2 Commissioner Stevenson commented that's' - section ardtr'h : r erciaid d medium densityis a keyportion because it tiff. wit ,4 a new desI9r ,a at"�`tii Y ��i'`" Commissioner Johnston inquired if Exhibits'andv``wtvould become part of the ��ii�iuz;i;� .i�, Comp Plan. Director Sheldon explained that '` 'i " adopts the resolution, the exhibits would be put into the Comp PlateNILAVICk Mr. Jay Anthony indicated that they,.: • ••,�' it-parce `•`,•.: # t are a part of their total PUD which are intended for roam i €pment a was concerned that aai�. `i`zi�`�i ` he would have to go through th entire Pl y' ach of the restaurant developments. Director ShelcVii indicated that uld need to amend the PUD • • �.ni• to add those uses and it wµi ` • be a tic hear ' process. Mr. Anthony commented that he ho r p� l`i"a, rova `` uld be wined at staff level. Director Sheldon explained that;**, ould aO ave tczt ' through a Comp Plan amendment process and that ti-us„ i. e was . d seed when they discussed the reza&part of. ei•••`,.rest. i iz;;�i`:,,., •pct nzi``�. sft.w.•'ii: .. . Cotler John mired if this was the only wording for District 1 in the Camp' use he=,ow here is something else being talked about for District„I 3 �i aot adi €t ed specifically in the proposed wording. Director Sh do � ,ii ..:1W Ast the wording reflects the fact that the primary purpose of the .otmp-Planwhat-wilt-happen-m the future so-va-cant1aml-tends Abe t` 'the focus as op o going parcel by parcel and discussing existing w? development. �``Mr”, Commissioner Obert inquired who will be responsible for the trailways system if it i 4i, ti. µY,`�. • .0•04.104.. approve or the Comp Plan. Director Sheldon indicated that the Parks and mami` ri�i Commission notes where the trail systems cross over land being ,iiiz„iiii iii.: >ii`:h`i.,} i:i"•� ered for development, and the location of trails is established at the `uiiivv. development plan stage. If they do not require Planning Commission review, other techniques may need to be used to relay this information. She added that it could be the responsibility of the Developer if that is what the City decides. •