05-21-1997 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mounds View Planning Commission April 16, 1997 • Special Meeting Page 8 She added that the consultants were also asked to research what was the peak of the generator. It was found to be from 8:30 p.m. to 9:30 p.m. She added that the intersections were re-tested using this peak and there is enough capa. for the U- turns to be accommodated. She briefly explained, for the benefit of the audien `es wha't'`` riii d Unit P (PUD) zoning appWal }`a "d :. merit that Development PUD district is: the �of a sp. �1�? ��" has a plan and description that goes with it tt ntrols. kind evA main' that occurs with certain stipulations. She in t th*there are tl tliWfor the PUD process: the conceptual stage wh �'re right now), ALA" P P 9 ( �„r �� `�. development stage (public hearings will be he'd a .t this stage by the Planning Commission and City Council) and the final pt t, .an administrative review. Director Sheldon continued by briefly descrit hg iteediaatthe Planned Unit Development document (Exhibit 1 of Ord',7„..f, No. r.v . uggested that another item be added: that all utiliti Y.. under . ' She noted that if the PUD document is approved `• pp b�ilrt •ti�i#�it wo 'ibe recorded against the property so that the control ,<tsted woo `1 ` govern the property and would be attached to the PUD; esignai. Sti , "that it is Staff's recommendation, with thestitipulatic# in plac `v'that the Planning Commission • recommend that the PUzz``••• ppro` and th, forwarded to the City Council. Commissioner Steve on con . staff for the way the information for this •••:, a�:h: , rem was pr- g Chair P• greed and commented that it was very zed a' be l:Ticult to handle this much detail without such the x:: :tr•rts. NEON* •a$vv�ryvi��}i4ti� 2xvv�ii>.L,`:.Z:$2: Mr. An.. ny fr q ' ed about a landscaping (#10 of the Planned Unit Daprrienf4 requirement that the property owner shall be made available $41-:bng the Highway 10 frontage for the City or City's agent to 4; >mplement the d €,s : ieme. Mr. Anthony was concerned with the footage the site :;Lplan provided kiiiithig area. Director Sheldon indicated that their proposed setback .::};::;t from the right4.way to the parking lot is 30 feet. Am4„ {�z••a`.fix?:µa. Vii;` `Chair Peron asked the applicant if there had been any changes with the plan .:r. z` s last discussion. Mr. Anthony indicated that there had not been any The Planning Commission continued with discussion on the traffic study. Commissioner Stevenson commented that the report verified a hunch the • Planning Commission had about the current zoning versus the proposal and that