My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-21-1997
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
05-21-1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2018 5:20:18 AM
Creation date
8/1/2018 5:05:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
5/21/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• Mounds View Planning Commission April 16, 1997 <br /> Special Meeting Page 9 <br /> the way it is zoned now actually produced more traffic than the current proposal. <br /> The difference is when the peak for developed property would occur. The peak for <br /> the different development would occur at different times, but the overjimpact is <br /> less. He was also concerned with the traffic impact on Longake. e`-d and <br /> County Road H2 and how it compares to the prey'•us <br /> Charlene Zimmer, Principal for SRF ConsultirO <br /> dressed •: x n indicatin. <br /> that the only changes that have occurred in "study h do: iistri n <br /> of traffic on Long Lake Road and County Ro: :Tx 2 th insulted 136'04410i .1 sed <br /> the regional traffic forecasting model to distrii : nps. She brie ed the <br /> results as noted in the revised traffic study. S s fined that what occurred is <br /> that the volumes did increase on CountyRoa.' :<: �,;� Lake Road from the <br /> last report from five to nine percent. She noted thatx * j zRoad H2 would have <br /> x�xzxzx�..`.xx::z�; <br /> an increase in traffic of 11 percent daily.• _ xxx,x <x.;;xx.. <br /> N x.•:: <br /> iv <br /> The Planning Commission and SRFCon� .cussed: arious traffic routes and <br /> distribution. .{.p:�;.z�` 'xzY xxxx ,,.. <br /> • Commissioner Johnsto xxxxxx. ua <br /> n; pressed� ome cor,:i�em with the safety of U-turns and <br /> indicated he did not see *d <br /> ,x�, �"ress��n the stir. Ms. Zimmer indicated that two <br /> of the three intersectior re sign;: 1 d whi.•.1.k.lfrianages the traffic flow and, <br /> they- ore, reduces :, a number o 4g.. f ;, r <br /> • the s.•ggestion by the Police Department to align <br /> entrance of the theater and signalize it. He asked <br /> this ,m .i t the traffic flow. Ms. Zimmer indicated that they <br /> had nQ: : ;,{ is flow y sis along Highway 10 with Edgewood Drive being a <br /> si Q4s, Shbelieved, however, that the level of congestion, to a <br /> a extent -d by-how-the-signals-are-timed-and-how-they gress. <br /> lithe expressed :'� <br /> of the concerns with adding a signal would be that it would <br /> Azib <br /> } complicate the #gsion of traffic and studies would need to be done to <br /> AK+ determine whether or not a signal could be effectively added on Highway 10. With <br /> regard to th ;`1 w of traffic, the opinion of the consultant was, that it was better to <br /> the <br /> . <br /> theater entrance to right-in, right-out because it helps on a high volume <br /> :x:::.xxx mak <br /> r ;; x xxxx: Aas Highway 10. Regarding left turns, the consultant added that it is <br /> ��\.:Y\�kx`YxYYxxx.rxi�\k2 <br /> ::mer-to have a four-legged intersection and it is better to have it signalized. Ms. <br /> Zimmer expressed some concerns with the number of access points because the <br /> more access points you have the more impact you have on safety and traffic flow. <br /> In terms of getting in and out of the site, a signalized, four-legged intersection is the <br /> . desirable solution. But in terms of the traffic flow on Highway 10, there is a <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.