Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission April 16, 1997 • <br /> Special Meeting Page 14 <br /> 7. <br /> Planning Case No. 477-97 <br /> Silver Lake Road and Highway 10 di <br /> Applicant: D.W. Jones, Inc. `; .�; <br /> Request for a Rezoning from B-2 to Planned Unit Develo ment tetx`. `` 'gas station with <br /> fast food and car wash components; restaurant; senior:• ' ing ""%:•';'.' "'•, rid office ' <br /> building. A_� l` �ti.: <br /> slY ` rte.' "'it#� ; r"` ; l <br /> Representatives of the applicant, D.W. Done ` i re represented`. <br /> meeting. <. .x:.>.,: <br /> Director Sheldon reviewed the staff report • x<.ed A �-• 7. She reminded the <br /> Commission that there was a lengthy dis9a on at thea ting regarding this <br /> project and the general consensus ofr; .i < ng ComMiton was that the <br /> overall combination of uses appee •su'if :tt4pne exception; the gas station. <br /> She believed their main conce ias the;0iiiker;`' �" 1'Stations already existing in <br /> Mounds View. Another concern expressed byt mission was the amount of <br /> development on the site an4 t e exte that the`development encroaches into the II <br /> wetland buffer. She ren i; ided the .>```• mission iat at their last meeting, they <br /> directed Staff to prepar ivo resp ns: orw: r approval and one for denial. She <br /> informed the Comm1ss 1 that, it ..., .s... on of approval, the main point of <br /> `" `' ,.,,:•.,.3...z <br /> . ".- Area 9 studyfor Highway 10 indicates <br /> e ` s's is thaaarch d �. .: 9 Y <br /> t pose ; � ..:suitable or the area. The reasons cited in support of <br /> ap .tide: tri` : .,`$.t:`�: • development is supported by a recent consultant <br /> study c.J airamof uses tOlgould be feasible and marketable in the Area 9 <br /> Sectio o H 10; 1PRoides a mixture of uses that appear compatible with <br /> the roup * n the"development, the uses are complimentary to one <br /> ,: tc her,1he tri:••• :.slows that theHighway 1-01 Silver LaVeRoad-intersection <br /> Airwill continue to Qt1 at an acceptable level of service; and the development <br /> . ` meets the spec* criteria in the PUD district. <br /> O <br /> `,\ Director She7n explained that in the resolution of denial, one of the points <br /> 1gpncer§. relationship to the Comp Plan. The Comp Plan that refers to <br /> :.r >i3E and facilitating development of commercial activities which are <br /> • "` ��'``"'•`` fementa to those that are already existing and with respect to all of the uses <br /> except the gas station, she felt the request has been met. With respect to the gas <br /> station, the resolution suggests the Planning Commission make a finding that there <br /> is an excess of this type of use in the surrounding community. Additional concerns <br /> are the possible detrimental affects of an additional gas station in a community that i <br /> already has six and that the traffic study has been questioned by the Ramsey <br />