Laserfiche WebLink
0 Mounds View Planning Commission April 16, 1997 <br /> Special Meeting Page 19 <br /> underground. Director Sheldon assured the Planning Commission that once the <br /> revisions have been made they would receive copies for their review and comment. <br /> 410 <br /> Mr. Black stated that he is in agreement with the PUD docuaent ''the <br /> exception of the issue relative to trailways. He added that L`}z$ ��a this issue can <br /> be brought up at the Council level. Pi.`-, ` x`i•`a+ �z` `•,,,. ' <br /> The PlanningCommission continued their di�ssion reg rng` iNank g <br /> iiim <br /> should be added to this request. For the item0 the F C documei `` }}`` h } <br /> wetland issues, Director Sheldon suggested `'" e owin wording`'� be <br /> used: "At the time of approval of these sti ulatto e wetland boundary was not <br /> set, that it will be set from the study that will subm to ;pt the development <br /> review stage and that at that time, the City 41evallatOlqr the amount of <br /> density allowed by this PUD needs to bewail u ted to takey $account a different <br /> wetland boundary than what was ava 1a ; <a t time of* .dual of the <br /> stipulations", which may mean that he deep be reduced. <br /> . v . ; ' ', �ix T <br /> Commissioner Obert expressed that t feels sway 10-Area 9 study is very <br /> • important to the City and <#his dev slopment crucial in putting the program <br /> together. t"` !, .i``' <br /> Chai Stevenson " .-nted t p•` t. -s the concern to be far more than <br /> im 'of the gat*!*,He re t he hasn't forgotten letters and citizen <br /> crn egardn ., ncem gadding another gas station to the community. <br /> He�� i e .the concen�; e.the use itself. <br /> Chair Pei * ked t� ience of they had any additional concerns. <br /> ; - Ron-Sc a o-Station-2800-Ht hwa 10 referred to-the SRF-Study, <br /> .<,$ age 29. He at x`rwve are really considering the true spirit and intent of the <br /> At redevelopment, ats which is to make a signature development for Section 9 and <br /> . k. are the oals �the studybeingaddressed with this development. <br /> ;Cd,„. <br /> arrie44a7es, 2 nays. Commissioner Stevenson expressed that he does not <br /> f�tunsed for the corner is the proper use for the PUD. Commissioner Obert <br /> exp i 1h*t he feels the process should be slowed down so that they can make a <br /> more informed decision. His main concern is with the architectural character of the <br /> Section 9 corridor and that this would be the first development using the Section 9 study. <br /> 0 <br />