My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-18-1997
MoundsView
>
City Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
06-18-1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2018 5:21:24 AM
Creation date
8/1/2018 5:13:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
6/18/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
yr err • ..rte -.v V •ar• va. -•••••• ry.. -V r ...a.,4410141D,m .yyr Tjvvv <br /> Pamela Sheldon <br /> June 6, 1997 <br /> Page 2 <br /> We suggest the public works department make a preliminary investigation to determine if a curb cut <br /> will remain as the primary means to drain Eastwood Road in the future. Another option may be to <br /> install catch basins and storm sewers which discharge to the ditch. A review of the submitted survey <br /> data indicates that it may be difficult to construct catch basins due to the low elevation of Eastwood <br /> Road and high elevation of the Highway 10 ditch. <br /> If the curb cut remains,the existing swale needs to be relocated to drain around the pond if the city <br /> wishes to maintain a direct discharge to the highway ditch. Another option is to work with the <br /> developer and have the pond expanded to provide water quality improvements for both their site and <br /> the roadway. If Eastwood Road does drain into the pond,the developer's engineer must include this <br /> additional drainage area in their hydrologic calculations. <br /> Site Grading Plan <br /> Upon review of the plan,we do not have the ditch,parking lot,and pipe slopes. A quick check of the <br /> site indicates that the parking lot has a flat slope which does not provide good drainage.If a surface <br /> elevation of 910.8 is at the northern most end of the site and the pond discharge is at 908.0,the slope <br /> in the parking lot is 0.49 percent(3.8 feet/570 feet). This is a relatively flat slope and may cause <br /> drainage problems such as standing water and ice patches in the parking lot. A final grading plan <br /> should show how this site drains. <br /> Pond Grading Plan <br /> The developer provided a rough outline of the pond but did not provide final contours. Due to it's <br /> location near pedestrian traffic,a safe pond should be designed by the developer and reviewed by the <br /> City. The City needs to verify that the pond meets retention pond standards for safety and function. <br /> At a minimum the pond should include 10 to 1 side slopes in the first foot of retention volume(or <br /> be fenced), have a water depth of at least four feet,and discharge at an elevation that will be high <br /> enough to drain to the highway ditch. <br /> Hydrologic Calculations <br /> A summary of the hydrologic calculations were provided but this information contained no detailed <br /> data. We would lice to review all of the hydrologic calculations,including input data,that was used <br /> to determine the highwater elevation(s)and sediment pond size. <br /> RJK/rjk/JTD <br /> WATTMANOIRBCANIOCCII vNTOTITI KMAN3ZA O <br /> S <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.