11-19-1997 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Planning Commission Report Silverview Estates PUD Development Review and Preliminary Plat November 19, 1997 • Page 3 Development Review: • The building area allowed in the PUD General Concept Plan for the senior housing component is 84,000 square feet maximum. The architectural site sheet 1 of 1 indicates that the building area for the senior housing is to be 115,800. The original building footprint of 84,000 was the result of the scaling of the building on the concept plan drawing. However, the building footprint has not changed since concept plan stage. Therefore, regardless of the number of square feet, the building mass and general design have not changed. This modification will require an amendment to the PUD resolution that was approved on May 27. This will be done prior to City Council action. • The amounts and percentages of pervious and impervious surfaces shown on the site plans for each of the lots within the PUD are inaccurate. The applicant has submitted corrected data as follows and will revise the site plans prior to City Council action. Pervious / Impervious Areas Lot No. Total Area in Pervious Area in Impervious Area in Square Feet Square Feet (%) Square Feet (%) • 1. 70,646 12,851 (18.2) 57,795 (81.8) 2. 92,587 30,081 (32.5) 62,506 (67.5) 3. 48,000 35,990 (75.0) 12,010 (25.0) 4. 355,984 298,827 (83.9) 57,157 (16.1) • Building heights are mislabeled on the latest submission for the proposed Holiday Stationstore. The applicant will correct these drawings to reflect accurate heights prior to City Council action. • In the most recent submittal there was no detail provided on the proposed canopy over the pump islands at the Holiday Stationstore. The applicant has submitted relevant detail for the canopy that shows height, materials and proposed signing. This information will be available to the Commission on the 19th. • The site plan sheet reflects a parking lot setback of 30 feet as required, but the label indicating 10' setback has not been removed. The applicant has been advised and will make the necessary change to the site plan. • The landscaping plan did not originally identify plant material by size and type and did not indicate the extent of existing trees on site to be preserved. The revised submittal includes • the required plant material information, and the applicant will provide a label for the areas shown as existing vegetation that will read"plant material to be maintained."