My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-04-1998
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
03-04-1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2018 6:19:32 AM
Creation date
8/1/2018 6:18:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
3/4/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission February 18, 1998 <br /> • Special Meeting Page 9 <br /> Commissioner Obert re-emphasized the need for an independent unbiased real estate <br /> appraiser. <br /> Gayla Keyes, 7730 Greenwood Drive, told the Commission that she has hired an <br /> independent real estate agent to assess her property. This person told her that her <br /> property would decrease in value. <br /> Cecelia Brownell, 7730 Greenwood Drive, told the Commission that the real estate agent <br /> had indicated the property would drop in value between$4,000-$14,000 dollars. She <br /> added she does not want the development in the neighborhood. <br /> Terry Moses asked if the appraisal was done by a certified appraiser, and continued by <br /> telling the Commission that there is a difference between a real estate agent and an MAI <br /> appraiser. He said real estate agents are held to lower standards that an MAI appraiser. <br /> He suggested hiring an MAI appraiser to do the work instead of a real estate agent. <br /> Director Jopke reminded the Commission and the meeting attendees that it is very <br /> important to keep in mind what the "big picture" is. He asked, "How can the staff provide <br /> the Commission, Developer and citizens with the type of information that is being <br /> requested?" He agreed with Mr. Cunningham's statement that it is very hard to quantify <br /> the effect that a development of the type will have on the surrounding neighborhood. <br /> Jopke stated the staff would make every attempt to locate information that is relevant to <br /> the situation and in turn forward that information to the appropriate people. <br /> Chairperson Peterson asked Benshoof and Associate's representative, Michael Chen to <br /> comment on the report that SEH had made regarding the traffic study. <br /> Michael Chen stated if you asked five different engineers the same question, most likely <br /> you'd get five different answers because of the way the information is collected. Benshoof <br /> and Associates gathered their information from different sources than SEH. He added <br /> that the differences in the two firm's figures were very minute. <br /> Mr. Cunningham added, Walgreen's is a neighborhood retailer, and draws its clientele <br /> from the immediate surrounding areas. The majority of the customers are live within 1.5 <br /> mile radius of the store. <br /> Chairperson Peterson asked Chen to summarize what the traffic study was indicating. <br /> Mr. Chen told the Commission the traffic study indicated the overall impact of the <br /> Walgreen's Development is not expected to have a significant negative impact on traffic to <br /> the affected neighborhood with the closing of Eastwood Drive. <br /> • Mr. Johnson stated he has lived in the neighborhood for 29 years, before the shopping <br /> center was developed, before any of the commercial developments on this section of <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.