|
1111
<br /> a
<br /> Mounds View planning Commission March 4, 1998 •
<br /> Regular Meeting Page 2
<br /> 4.
<br /> Planning Case No. 513-98 <
<br /> 8265 Spring Lake Road
<br /> Applicant: Preferred Builders, Inc. _:
<br /> Consideration of Resolution No. 532-98, Approving a 7-fo: :rianc= -:g .. • •uired 30-foot
<br /> Front-Yard Setback. ,. y.
<br /> s.
<br /> £.s:'s((Rr,'
<br /> f i
<br /> The applicant, Preferred Builders, Inc., was pres- 36
<br /> ' �" `"21 s"" '`Gxd:s"`sJ%fKis
<br /> xy
<br /> s.��. fix.
<br /> Inspector Dorgan referred to the February 27, .:11,0:. Commission Memo which
<br /> reminded the Commission Members that on Fe• ary 1•,',�_� . #.;.Commission tabled the
<br /> Variance Request byPreferred Builders in o >E . allow t : `-< n.> `�_
<br /> q _•et an opinion from
<br /> the City Attorney in regards to languages ` tamed i` a urchase agreement
<br /> that Preferred Builders had with the E ti,i° o ; g 8 $, ed pr .erty.
<br /> mac .. ' �:� ,..
<br /> tff
<br /> Staff asked the City Attorney th .11 >€ r<
<br /> owinm esti,`'� City obligated to
<br /> provide a variance for the Developer te.,€,a ; d the mum #:Arovements it desires to construct? •
<br /> The City Attorney respond;g'« he 13‘.--,':"
<br /> .:-,' "answer i `o, since the EDA cannot generally
<br /> obligate the City toan : §ariance Y
<br /> L' e, pursu - . • greeme.,:; 4 .riance is necessary, it is the Developer's
<br /> af.),Z.,1014),,,,11,iL obtati : `'. ,.ary perms s, etc. for the construction of the Minimum, If the - i '«�.; can show some type of hardship (whatever that ma be),
<br /> a van. -`. : en be a i.$N :;_;>:.. '.t the request of the Developer, but the Agreement
<br /> itself dt,4 g �& , - the g' _, -,1 `g of a variance. Such request would be independent of
<br /> th- `'_ veeme ':'g: ,.' :
<br /> . ::.suant b City Code, the burden of sustaining such request would
<br /> $`•that of the D ,4 se
<br /> :a
<br /> Chairperson Pe r
<br /> ;fson returned the floor to the Commission for questions and comments.
<br /> Commission. i•Stevenson asked if the proposed plan had been reworked to allow for the
<br /> 5 '` '>> ernat -foot variance as had been proposed at the Planning Commission Special
<br /> ' � o- _ -1d Feb
<br /> s ruary 18, 1998.
<br /> Darryl Westerlund, representing Preferred Builders, responded by saying the original
<br /> garage width of 32' could be down sized to 28', with all of the width reduction coming
<br /> out of the large garage door opening. He added the depth of the garage and the body of
<br /> the house would remain the same.
<br /> II
<br />
|