Laserfiche WebLink
V <br /> • Mounds View planning Commission March 4, 1998 <br /> Regular Meeting Page 3 <br /> Mr. Westerlund told the Commission that many custom features are included in the <br /> house, including elliptical windows, brick, landscaping etc. The Developer feels the <br /> house, as proposed, will sell with its curb appeal. <br /> Commissioner Obert asked Director Jopke if the H. sing Re$ <. <A—Program had <br /> been discussed at the City Council Workshop sessi s ' t had``>•`.+" <- the preceding <br /> week. This question was raised because the Corn loner feel,l,9g`1" '$- <br /> miscommunication that has come about from th-y : .ers< >$. . cou g . <br /> eferred ` - <br /> have been avoided with some modifications ' <br /> to t ousine � eplacemen' "R :" <br /> Director Jopke told the Commissioners that the # y ' been discussed by the <br /> Council and a resolution would be forthcoming t11 `,,''r ' ' ess three changes to the <br /> existing policy. These changes were stated as ftp ows: y<%:<. <br /> 1. Under the existing policy a tena1 3$" , operty .} ;r i s e considered. The <br /> t <br /> revision would make it possib" ."'co'n e 34' ondit ,''on a case by case basis. <br /> 2. A suggested change to t:;:cumber ka b critert.. $.: ; .roperty would have to meet <br /> III a. <:.. <br /> to be considered for 0rogra <br /> 3. A change in the t ` of"tea ' at wou1 ,e eligible to be involved in thet tic <br /> program. .L ; ,:;_ <br /> G: V 5 <br /> :MIro .thing ?�.;: : sed in t'i''- ouncil planning session that would relate to the <br /> Pre . `„7.„,,,,.,41.4.4 er Inc . <br /> Comm'. o ::,<#r:ks ask?re-= applicant what their plan was going to be if the <br /> V . e ' eq ; .: $enied. <br /> r. Westerlun 0.`”i 3v, e Commission that Preferred Builders would be forced into <br /> -t <br /> r <br /> building a smalle 'ome with a two-car garage. He stated in the light of today's market <br /> demand for hoz : with three-cargarages that a smaller home with the two-car garage <br /> H;;'-`:;:, would be han to market. <br /> t n,< ; a; E oner Brasaemle stated he did not think the Developer has showed a hardship <br /> s'OPMMfrould fill that requirement of the Variance. He added, after reviewing the Spring <br /> Parade of Homes floor plans, that there is plan with a three-car garage that could be <br /> adapted to this piece of property that would not require a variance. <br /> • Mr. Westerlund told the Commission that Preferred Builders would gladly build a smaller <br /> home with a two-car garage if the City would cancel the current purchase agreement that <br />