My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-17-1994
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Economic Development Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1994
>
11-17-1994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/20/2018 5:54:32 AM
Creation date
8/1/2018 6:29:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
11/17/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
A number of vacant parcels presently exist along the Corridor, <br /> presenting opportunities for multi-unit residential and/or <br /> commercial development. Any development along Highway 10 should <br /> not preclude the extension of Knollwood south of Ardan Avenue. <br /> Regardless of the ultimate land use, parcels along the Corridor <br /> will have to be established with enough depth to provide for <br /> adequate building setbacks and to effectively manage site access. <br /> At past public meetings, the neighborhoods abutting the Corridor <br /> have expressed their desire to continue residential development. <br /> Care must be exercised in accomplishing this to assure that the <br /> existing residential property owners along the Corridor are not <br /> being used as a buffer to protect the majority of residential <br /> uses beyond the immediate Corridor impact area. The areas of low <br /> density residential abutting commercial uses are particularly <br /> susceptible to Corridor development and is referenced in Figure <br /> D. <br /> Old Highway 10 should be viewed and planned as Mounds View's <br /> "Main Street. " As such, development within the Corridor needs to <br /> be organized and managed to reflect a positive identity for the <br /> community and, to the extent possible, one which reinforces the <br /> desired image. <br /> A plan which seeks to establish the Corridor as a regional or <br /> sub-regional trade center or collection of regionally oriented <br /> 4111 land uses is not readily supportable. The pattern of competing <br /> regional centers (Northtown, Brookdale and Rosedale shopping <br /> centers) serves the city well. The availability of sites within <br /> the city, of significant size to provide for consolidated busi- <br /> ness within a possible regional center, is also limited. Com- <br /> petition, accessibility and site capability serve to reduce the <br /> potential and desirability of structuring a major regional center <br /> here. <br /> The treatment of the Corridor as a continuous commercial highway <br /> strip development is plausible and potentially achievable. <br /> However, such an evenly treated, single-purpose District oriented <br /> to highway retail and commercial uses contradicts the overriding <br /> objective of Old Highway 10 development. That objective seeks to <br /> establish an identity and organization to the Corridor which <br /> produces a "Main Street" . . . a community-oriented environment. <br /> The creation of an Old Highway 10 Corridor and management frame- <br /> work recognizes the mutually reinforcing uses available in the <br /> area. The Corridor framework and concept of "Main Street" <br /> further suggests the categorization of the area into several <br /> distinct sectors: East Gate, City Center and West Gate. <br /> East Gate, centered on the junction of Old Highway 10 <br /> and I-35W, would serve the regional traveler and <br /> emphasize highway commercial and hospitality uses. <br /> 4111 Rev. 8/91 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.