|
. •
<br /> March 18, 1998
<br /> Mounds View Planning Commission page 4 •
<br /> Regular Meeting
<br /> Chair Peterson asked for a vote on the motion on the floor.
<br /> Ayes 4 Nays-2 (Brasaemle, Obert) K£,
<br /> The motion carried. ::', f ''
<br /> ,��x =: A put the
<br /> ent as
<br /> Commissioner Brasaemle made his oppositions fol • jg
<br /> builder in the unfortunate position of having to d•3. e dirty w41::,'" of a s $ . _
<br /> that the ED "4.eW ubstandar•" '
<br /> controversial variance on a property % � � The EDA, in a �„ ,� rced the
<br /> builder would have a problem getting the vanan«:;y q;;.Fi. would not normally approve.
<br /> Planning Commission to grant a variance on a prof-'1','-
<br /> � ,
<br /> F
<br /> � e first opportunity the
<br /> opposition stat . ent �x#.,A
<br /> Commissioner Obert made his ' �; �,� i they decided to go
<br /> City had to do something right with the Hous',!,.. eplaceu
<br /> around the rules. Obert said he disagre� _ .. .proach t' o em solving.
<br /> Hwy- r
<br /> t3aaS ,,
<br /> ��tis-x �,.;
<br /> ' Kx. • yN u7�
<br /> '�'• �� bas Rs��
<br /> 6. f - .Planning Case No. 507-97 .;
<br /> ,�9�.�;Roa•
<br /> 2625 Highway 10, 7715-7761 Eas'.•.
<br /> Applicant TOLD Developmentmpany .
<br /> do of Resolutio ,,o 6-98 R to . ` omprehensive Plan Amendment and
<br /> Considera °�
<br /> Rezoning ° $est for Wal:>..7"-='";,II evelopiu
<br /> ..-„,,,-•;.,..:-..., -,
<br /> ' Company, was present.
<br /> �y s n,���LD D tt s rzt- = P Y.
<br /> The app ,'1,z;5:44,',;.,.'....,.Q
<br /> 4 �:, 1998
<br /> Assocra e irks, , .Sewed t 'e Planning Commission Memo dated March 18,
<br /> �.«. -,7',',(red . ,, . - ••8 Plannin� Commission
<br /> chgavebac • `i:► .rma i• - . .. 10
<br /> x meeting where a : • r $•ata for County Road I betweenaccident data for the intersection of
<br /> ' was discussed. .: o.iscussed at this meeting was
<br /> ,
<br /> Highway 10 an r ounty Road I.
<br /> Q ,, • pact to,,,r, `es of adjacent properties was discussed.
<br /> iscus a ana mat on was requested that
<br /> � can Planning
<br /> : f 'x- 5 4 a:
<br /> Y �.��• •tt s(APA)research division was contacted
<br /> a'- t9 help shed some light on how the Walgreen's not v n recent would
<br /> d uldt ime tpacme of the
<br /> the
<br /> surrounding neighborhood. The information had
<br /> March 18, 1998 meeting. As soon as the information becomes available the Commission
<br /> and public will be brought up to date on this issue.
<br /> is still involved in negotiations with the neighboring property owners •
<br /> TOLD Development e delvaluation issues.
<br /> on how best to resolve the water drainage and prop rtY
<br />
|