My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-01-1998
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
04-01-1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2018 6:31:26 AM
Creation date
8/1/2018 6:31:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
4/1/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
120
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission March 18, 1998 <br /> Regular Meeting Page 6 . <br /> TOLD is recommending that funds be set aside in an escrow account to construct the <br /> traffic calming devices. Input from the Greenwood neighborhood residents will be <br /> encouraged. N,r <br /> /y. <br /> Associate Ericson requested that the Commission review the or. ::.' def it was drafted <br /> and review Resolution 536-98. Staff is looking for fw='• ck i '` `x� needed changes <br /> and also, if it is possible for the Commission to in•ta =�m ed if the a F �- a oward <br /> approving or denying the Comprehensive Plan Am:-- dment au ezo -�t <br /> H/" <br /> Commissioner Miller suggested several gramrnatg ges, which Eri e <br /> would correct. She also questioned the reference < a 's review of the process. It <br /> was suggested that MnDOT has not given a definit :' .awe € the intersection <br /> construction that would be part of this project. %ma45 mss. <br /> xsem,�.; <br /> Chair Peterson made reference to text thn, a� o a side' � ; he City would <br /> require that a sidewalk would extend t,•.� st,5. .3:a�;. •,`: 'ng Lak f oad", he suggested this <br /> ` n <br /> section of the Resolution would be =►�`place � $ •- 's earlier comments <br /> regards to where a sidewalk will •; •uilt ani • ho i• ,•?f a • cover the cost of the <br /> • <br /> sidewalk. r v• <br /> t <br /> 11111 <br /> Commissioner Stevenso= ;xed if th =were planfor a designated crosswalk from the <br /> Walgreen property t. a o``ry ds Vie :: <br /> `a i• l4kQ <br /> •^)i.4Y^ ....b' Sy ,ki)3. <. <br /> annissioner B . aem s .id he watt • •e very concerned about having a crosswalk <br /> mi• • o said, 'lla'-='-"V,t11,e street isn't going to cut it", referring to cars that are <br /> curren s ped-. '• 8 • ;zones. <br /> Commisstone• rte• venson stated that people go around the corner very fast at the <br /> e�rsection and County Road I, making a crosswalk located there very•angerous. <br /> • <br /> Chair Peterso :pened the floor to the public for questions and comments. <br /> l,„ <br /> y F ;� arol AT 50 Greenwood Drive,said she would not send her children down a sidewalk <br /> r 8$ es on County Road Ito get to a Walgreen's store. She said, "A crosswalk is not <br /> ss• make cars stop." Her opinion was stated in favor of having a sidewalk all the way <br /> to Long Lake Road. <br /> Gayla Keyes, 7730 Greenwood Drive, asked if the City had contacted an assessor to have <br /> an official evaluation of the impact that the Walgreen's Development would have on the • <br /> adjacent neighborhood. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.