My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-28-1995
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Economic Development Commission (Disbanded)
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
09-28-1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/20/2018 6:19:11 AM
Creation date
8/1/2018 6:38:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
9/28/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
83
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
11111 BENEFITS <br /> • Create a streetscape that improves the image and reinforces the unique qualities of Excelsior <br /> Boulevard; Integrate the functional needs to move the traffic with safety and aesthetic needs <br /> to creating a comfortable pedestrian environment; attract more and better businesses to the <br /> corridor; and make the corridor a special, positive feature of the community. <br /> I. CONCLUSION <br /> A part of each plan can be identified with the situation of Highway 10 in Mounds View. <br /> Reviewing the positive and negatives of each plan allows Mounds View to incorporate proven <br /> plan aspects as we move ahead on creating a cohesive "Highway 10 Plan." <br /> X. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION <br /> One of the key reasons for undertaking community outreach activities is simply to deter <br /> negative sentiments of local citizens. The critical goal is to prevent opposition and to create <br /> support; any supportive action that results is simply a desirable secondary effect. <br /> Three primary factors cause community opposition to development projects: lack of <br /> • adequate information, fear of being ignored, and conflict of goals. Mounds View residents have <br /> been informed on the redevelopment of Highway 10 through FOCUS 2000 reports. Lack of <br /> involvement can be resolved through public participation. This has been done with FOCUS 2000 <br /> but further public participation is recommended as the process moves forward. <br /> Traditional forms of public information include fact sheets, bulletins, newsletters, direct <br /> mail pieces videos, etc. In additions, presentations such as open-door workshops or broad <br /> community meetings are often set up to disseminate public information. Unfortunately, these <br /> events can create a forum for potential opponents to meet each other and to hear each other's <br /> complaints. There are several ways to communicate how a project will look or how a <br /> development will affect views. It has been proven that computer modeling, comparative <br /> architectural elevations, or mock-up "story poles" shown in the height of a proposed project can <br /> dispel fears about impacts more effectively than general promises or reassurances. Apple Valley <br /> and Roseville used these techniques to gain consensus on redevelopment plans. Visual aids such <br /> • 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.