04-15-1998 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mounds View Planning Commission April 15, 1998 Special Meeting Page 8 Ayes -7 Nays- 0 The motion carried. Chairperson Peterson told the applicant the case would bepass- ,e n to k `"` Council P PP � City for their review on April 27, 1998. N` 2 X33 . 2 . l£ s$ 3 9. &k 3 ayn Planning Case No 507-97 2625 Highway 10, 7715 -7761 Eastwood Road Applicant: TOLD Development Company au' 3c32 �32ss�.t? Consideration of Resolution Nos. 536-98 and 538-98 1V;, ying' R& ;n's Development Request, Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Reze • Reques ,,, 3 SJ26i ! The applicant, TOLD Developm.#` Comp .,was , 411 Associate Ericson stated o ‘ in e No. 5 =• -97 was back before the Planning Commission for reconsid on of a g t'`ion th. ,o.d d been made at the April 1, 1998 Planning Commissi e e k:.ar meet,, _ . 'on to deny recommending approval by th- ;Council .,• „ . 3 ion No 9 .i d 538-98 had not been voted on because the tl ` the re• } M d not m '".:' th the Planning Commission's approval. Updat $' of eac t were submitted for the Planning Commission's conside_ _ $ -, action`' proposal would need to be taken by May 29, 1998. • tea: QAC. e 9 • • ghborina prnn re presented to the Tanning Commi `t': '-7-''new new information in the case. Chairperson P•' rson clarified the fact that at the last meetingCommissioner Brasaemle had withdra s motion and no action was taken. He asked the applicant if he(TOLD) ad any n`:.::> formation to present in the case. < ,.:44 ,. , .. 9.obCunningham, TOLD Development Company, asked the Planning Commission to pass the case on to the City Council so that he might have an opportunity to address them on the case. He also asked, as a stipulation of approving the Development Plan, that the developer be required to get MnDOT approval for the Highway 10 access into the site. This would lift the burden of overriding a MnDOT decision off of the City's shoulders. 11111 Commissioner Obert asked the applicant if this action meant that the development would