Laserfiche WebLink
• Mounds View Planning Commission April 15, 1998 <br /> Special Meeting Page 9 <br /> continue without the Highway 10 access. <br /> Mr. Cunningham concurred. He added there are currently two adjacent property owners <br /> that have not reached some type of settlement with the developer on behalf algreens. <br /> Carol Arel,7750 Greenwood Drive, made the follo • g state > ,„ <br /> "I've prepared some remarks. So I would apprecia x .t being i• ;gid, $ • just allow <br /> to say what I have to say. <br /> As you all know I have stood up at many of then •efore, along wits , <br /> residents of Mounds View. And,although,I may• ',� g - of the few residents you hear <br /> from tonight, I'm asking you to consider many o < ' fig � � ew residents that are not <br /> here tonight. The residents that Pm asking you onsi o ,_ gh esidents that are <br /> unaware of the plans being made to change •mprehe 4� si sus 'or to completion of <br /> public hearings on the plan. There are r, 1 •Tc �° . have neir awareness raised <br /> to this issue as of yet, due to the cont effie s g w talks • e Comprehensive Plan. <br /> Pm asking the Planning Commis to fol1•%. the • .. r ou began to lay out at the <br /> • meeting two weeks ago,whic• £ o passecomme g k . ion denying the changes to the <br /> Comprehensive Plan. I as .>. ; 'ou d• et an u nate situation of the two week <br /> delay due to an inadequa 4i=s •repare• ,. nial pre • • al stop you from, what I believe you <br /> saw, as the right cour' . •k"ction tw• • <br /> f ga-rf` <br /> Mou''.$19;41S".1). d the ' . ' ng Commission in particular, have heard what <br /> �f <br /> f the • § ?`s>' g Y City"� �, :; you to do as officials of the Ci in connection with the <br /> •Ian,an& .- atprior meetings of the Comprehensive--the <br /> Comp ���� ><> g P <br /> Com re ' R e.• meeti r= ' d that is not to zone commercial property next to R-1 <br /> reside • • • • =m is is a'ommuni issue settinga clan erous receden in <br /> �f • tY g P >; my <br /> • • • - • • t k. •- _onal-is ent property owners. <br /> 'm standing befo as a concerned member of the community, who has refused thus <br /> far, to be pressu0 into a last-minute agreement with the developer. Because I still believe <br /> that communif,l,nd the good of the people in the community should come first. <br /> 4 ant to teach mychildren that theycan stillgrow upin a societywhere people <br /> �• �. .... P P <br /> >: �u each other, not in a society where the "me first attitude" expressed in prior <br /> meetings, is the norm. I want my kids to know that if they elect responsible officials, and <br /> work within the processes with those officials, it's likely that a reasonable resolution will <br /> be reached. <br /> . And since Mr. Cunningham has brought up the agreements,I'd like to specifically refer to a <br /> couple of things connected to the agreements: <br />