Laserfiche WebLink
PLANNING COMMISSION Page 2 • <br /> July 15, 1998 <br /> All Planning Commission Members acknowledged receipt of the City's current <br /> Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and Zoning Map. <br /> Jopke told the Commission the Maps' color designations had bee pie•;-'"ted by the I- <br /> 35W Corridor Coalition in an attempt to standardize 1. d use4"'across the <br /> corridor. This process was intended to simplify the i`&33 uni s between all of <br /> the communities that are members of the "Coalite•0 ' e sugg- City of <br /> Mounds View return to its original approach of. .• gnating ' ft`•erti- to <br /> instead of dense as had been done on the Mapore t e ' ommissio n: <br /> density, g. <br /> The Land Use Map and the Zoning Map were co i! . .g ,.ne another in an attempt to <br /> bring out any inconsistencies that exist between t!!!,,-I'r4tr§Ffir From a land use <br /> perspective, it was determined that the Highwa '' 0 co }K . , . ea that needs the <br /> most attention and analysis as to how the av,•. land al. :a .•dor could be used. <br /> t:T 3fygr z `s t s •. <br /> Jopke asked the Commission to cons At • t $ Ss,-s to 1.,,f . use along the Highway <br /> 10 corridor: <br /> 1. Should the land bed• •ted fo fly.•ecific us4',. <br /> 2. Should the land be *s '` •th . case-by se basis? <br /> Obe stated it was bi coli ensus o Q m.1. ` at participated in the community forum <br /> pr.` zl hat Hi_ 041 ould bei main area of commercial development. The <br /> $ � • expr ,g! <br /> Aeeling t a'" ounty Road I should not be developed for <br /> co 14‘, A4 `�. -, he a.4 <br /> Peters•$ : S51., 3 .t the development of County Road I depended to a large <br /> e �: •n w {� � s� . _ 'borin communities of Shoreview, Blaine, and Arden Hills had <br /> • ed for dew g 7 gi; ; <br /> • their cities. Future development in the cities could impact <br /> ounds View's .: oad I as a through road to their cities. <br /> • Stevenson stat-gay hat the planning that is taking place by the City of Mounds View on the <br /> f Comprehens 'lan Update is a blueprint for the future. If the Planning Commission <br /> • cided e esignate the remaining residential properties along Highway 10 or County <br /> �A i epi 'usiness use, it would not mean that the home owners were being te asked to <br /> e from their homes. The redesignation would only go into affect Wand when the <br /> property changed ownership, he added. <br /> Peterson suggested that the City make a strong effort to change the Zoning Map to reflect <br /> the Comprehensive Land Use Map, particularly on the Highway 10 properties which are • <br /> "grossly out of sync." <br />