My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-19-1998
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
08-19-1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2018 7:31:47 AM
Creation date
8/1/2018 7:30:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
8/19/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• PLANNING COMMISSION Page 3 <br /> July 15, 1998 <br /> Brasaemle expressed concern in regards to the tax implications that the people, whose <br /> property is now zoned residential, would be faced with if their zoning was changed to <br /> business use. The property tax would be based on a higher valued commer.4.a' use rather <br /> than a lower valued residential use. <br /> Miller suggested safeguarding the current residents F 'ase Zia•K,`,1irk, way 10 <br /> corridor. This would allow the City to rezone th i#-.perry for -. ............: .,. a and <br /> development as business or commercial. <br /> Peterson suggested establishing a 285 feet plus-i. . ,o. ; one on either sig s$ =3_ way <br /> 10-as the commercial corridor. The corridor wo om the east end of Highway <br /> 10 to the west end of Highway 10, he added. • <br /> Miller expressed concern in regards to co • , develo• E <.h of County Road <br /> H2, especially with the resistance that is,� , to the t'' yk« development. <br /> A lengthy discussion ensued in w _ the P1. tfs 4,:r;?-.(ogai;,,,,,,pi. Members drew in their <br /> proposed 285 foot setback on t a orth . $cx outh ;) ' 'ghway 10, going the full <br /> east/west length of the high f` sing t urrent ifrprehensive Land Use Map for the <br /> basis of their designation p,•io s'. s. : aemle s s ested that the last piece of residential <br /> property next to the Eve riangu ,4 aped •>i., erty needed to be included in the <br /> High ay 10 corrido • ercial d"4"jtAivli _ e also recommended that Town's Edge <br /> •T ..e desi i„.4.<9,1 - €� •strial, L` nal/Warehouse, or Mixed-Use PUD. <br /> '441 ` :gest- g the oven's Edge Terrace property as HC/IND PUD. The <br /> • <br /> resas ssi• d 'th the designation of HC/IND PUD for the Town's Edge <br /> Terrac ;-ff i <br /> 2.. <br /> B. PI .: g ; SEa Vaca”cy and Terms (Verbal Report) <br /> opke told the Cb-.$._T$li, mon that City staff had received, and subsequently lost, a list of <br /> potential Conuni •on candidates that would be added to the list that had already been <br /> discussed. In big of this fact, the selection of a candidate would have to be tabled in <br /> order to giv-r,, staff the time it needs to locate the missing list and add these names to <br /> •e list o idates being considered by the City to fill the vacancy on the planning <br /> • ''','-110,i1:4;?;''`n. <br /> Obert suggested that all applicants that are considered for the vacancy should be <br /> interviewed by the Planning Commission, including Liaison Koopmeiners, prior to <br /> selection by the Mayor and approval of the selection by City Council. The Commission <br /> • unanimously agreed with Obert's suggestion. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.