Laserfiche WebLink
PLANNING COMMISSION Page 4 . <br /> July 15, 1998 <br /> C. Update on Overton Foyer Expansion at 2824 Woodale Drive <br /> Ericson told the Commission that the Overtons had not presented archite = - plans to <br /> the City when they applied for their variance. The applicants has ven •,w-oral <br /> presentation through their architect and this presentati'n was t p;.;06,m'•,m'••tion that the <br /> Commission used in making their decision to grant s s , 'an $• I t the addition to <br /> the home is taking place, the roof lines that had b •escribed >6er and in <br /> • <br /> character with the existing home, were not fittin!� with th :A act- f� •Ai ` `' 'stmt <br /> house or the neighborhood. <br /> Obert expressed concern that the City's developm €� ..-ments for this type of project <br /> didn't stipulate that an addition must fit in with t '•t-q :hborhood or blend in with <br /> • <br /> the existing house. • <br /> Ericson quoted from Section 1125 of th 4 Varian �g e variance would not <br /> be material detrimental to the purpose � ` , � ether a �`serty in the same zone." <br /> u; <br /> Brasaemle suggested that the Pl.., ` g Co.ft 'ssio `� he Code to require <br /> -.me <br /> architectural drawings on vn.(4� ��- appli :;;'ons ons that +me before the Commission. <br /> • <br /> Ericson quoted from Co. . All pre . .ed and y al, commercial, and residential <br /> deve•e ments and e n Io ns of e s, except developments where public <br /> ut' a d stree :. —t eviously'isi#0+" ed and the erection of no more than two <br /> sr gv,vt s gle- • $iii S;i5§,p- - H gs are p : ed must be reviewed by the City." This <br /> sta d m. ental review necessary for the type of project that the <br /> Overto Fill ang con $� <br /> Jo ' gge 1,F W =-..ing a code requirement that ties existing conditions to the <br /> posed new a--.- t £ <br /> Brasaemle sugg- d erbiage a follows: "Any expansion of an existing facility that <br /> requires a vari.:.-- has to go through a development review." <br /> ,'eterso. ; ' d: "Politically and historically the City is stuck with letting people do <br /> • ey want to do, appearancewise." <br /> • <br /> Ericson suggested getting the Council's feedback on the issue. Have them make a <br /> judgement as to whether or not the Code language is acceptable or Wit needs to be <br /> amended to try to solve this type of problem. <br /> 6. Chairperson and Planning Commissioner's Reports • <br />