Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission Resolution 560-98 <br /> • September 2, 1998 <br /> Page 3 <br /> 5. The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship. <br /> The minimum required width for two aisles of parking with an access drive in between <br /> them is sixty feet, which is what was shown on the original development plans. The <br /> variance requested will allow for the sixty feet to be installed according to the plans <br /> approved by the City Council. <br /> 6. The variance would not be materially detrimental to the purpose of this Title or to other <br /> properties in the same zone. <br /> Both circulation and safety between and within the two properties would improve while <br /> parking can be sufficiently expanded to meet the requirements as outlined by the City <br /> Code <br /> 7. The variance would not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property or <br /> substantially increase the congestion of the public streets or increase the danger of fire or <br /> endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the <br /> neighborhood. <br /> • The joint parking and access would improve congestion, improve public safety and <br /> improve parking on both sites. <br /> Recommendation: <br /> Approve Planning Commission Resolution 560-98, a resolution approving a variance for a zero- <br /> foot setback for a parking lot, on properties located at 2200 - 2214 Highway 10. <br /> • <br /> James Ericson, Planning Associate <br /> NADATA\GROUPS\COMDEV\DE VCASES\536-98\VARIANCE.RPT <br /> • <br />