Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission Resolution 561-98 <br /> Donatelles Variance 7 <br /> • November 18, 1998 <br /> Page 2 <br /> WHEREAS, exceptional or extraordinary circumstances do apply to the property which <br /> do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone or vicinity and result from lot size or <br /> shape, topography or other circumstances over which the owners of the property since the <br /> effective date hereof have had no control, in that the Donatelles property is a small, unusual pie- <br /> shaped lot at the intersection of two major roadways through the City. Being less than an acre in <br /> area, the lot without question creates practical difficulties which the present owners did not <br /> create; and, <br /> WHEREAS, the literal interpretation of the provisions of this Title would deprive the <br /> applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district in that enforcement <br /> of the thirty-foot parking lot setback onto the Donatelles property after thirty years of operation <br /> in its present state would potentially deprive the property of as many as 50 parking stalls, a <br /> reduction that would effectively prohibit the restaurant from operating at that location; and, <br /> WHEREAS, special conditions or circumstances do not result from the actions of the <br /> applicant in that the applicant is only seeking to improve the appearance and functionality of the <br /> parking lot and to lessen the extent of the nonconformity--the applicant did not create the <br /> conditions which necessitate the approval of a variance; and, <br /> • WHEREAS, granting the variance requested would not confer on the applicant a special <br /> privilege that is denied by this Title to owners or other lands, structures or buildings in the same <br /> district in that Donatelles Supper Club was one of the first businesses located in the City of <br /> Mounds View, a fixture that has continued to do business through four decades to the present. <br /> Granting a variance in this situation would not confer upon the applicant a special privilege, in <br /> that any property owner in a similar circumstance would be given the same consideration; and, <br /> WHEREAS, the variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the <br /> hardship, in that the intent of the request is to lessen the extent of the existing nonconformity and <br /> to improve the overall appearance of the property; and, <br /> WHEREAS, the variance would not be materially detrimental to the purpose of this Title <br /> or to other properties in the same zone in that the Zoning Code was not drafted with the intent to <br /> prevent a legally conforming business from improving its operation. Granting the requested <br /> variance would serve to legitimize a dimensional nonconformity which has been in existence for <br /> thirty years; and, <br /> WHEREAS, the variance would not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent <br /> property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets or increase the danger of fire <br /> or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the <br /> neighborhood in that granting this variance will improve the flow of traffic in and around the site <br /> • and will be a benefit to public safety by closing the Highway 10 access from the Donatelles <br /> property. No property values will be diminished or impaired as a result of the Donatelles <br /> improvements. <br />