01-06-1999 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

i Mounds View Planning Commission December 16, 1998 • Special Meeting Page 3 used as warehouse, storage or manufacturing.) The revised landscape plan indicates all of the same species, in similar ratios, and e.,t4= exceeds the previous plan by an additional five plantings. Staff has asked the City F• ter tV--view the revised landscape plan in the event that any of the species hay been rem # •find to be susceptible to disease or any other problems. The access and drive aisles are in conformance with Fir `-partme •uire #; 5zakt,, an. 4's. Because of the angled loading bays at the rear of the bu _, tru•4,"raffic will •61:01.0;4. the north driveway and exit only from the south driveway. _ feet of impervio ace at the rear of the building to sufficiently accommodate the .i maneuvering of the trucks. The building will tie into existing watermains and sant:-.• sewe d e Fire Marshall has been sent a copy of the utility plan to verify locatio umber o i, � drants available for the site and building. Ericson told the Planning Commission of } ssue ra r •'-1.. � 4:- '.ay by the City Engineer and Director of Public Works regardin_ ;}e south ;r vewa ! development. It was f • suggested that Clifton Drive be exte+g,- , into th :uilding '•'and Mounds View Inn properties to eliminate a possible point of traffi ct. P— drivewa„ or the uss mentioned are within twenty feet of each other and ar4ectly a R$• from ,,Er on Drive. Tim Nelsof� .resentin.; '- = Group, it; ommission that Everest does not have a tenant fac• .54 ed buy• • a , design o `a e building gives Everest the flexibility it needs to accommod = types • *474.4r44,-,, Several photographs of existing buildings were offered n6 to give the Co" ,"• 1.:. idea yt: proposed structure would look like. Several reports were offered t. 00e«t *army ation for the type of building that is being proposed. • ge • r 3• ;:f • ,w011• 1 • - • •i 's es would not be completed at the time an o « pant was signed.° ' "on concurred with Peterson's comments. n said Everest is a' 'ng for approval of the "plan" so that they have the flexibility of either l v •g the previousi-.pproved office/warehouse building or the building that is before the Co ion to gh `"Construction would begin spring of 1999, Nelson added. f ; • N= st e idea of the extension of Clifton and redoing the driveway connection at the southwest corner of the site was a new issue and would be addressed after being analyzed by Everest staff Nelson did say that the extension seemed problematic from the standpoint that Everest has spent a lot of time developing the alternate building and companion engineering plans. • Nelson said Everest would like to keep traffic from the Mounds Inn and this site as far away from each other as possible. Peak hours in the mornings would see traffic coming into the Everest site