Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> Mounds View Planning Commission December 16, 1998 <br /> Special Meeting Page 4 • <br /> and peak hours in the afternoon would see traffic leaving, which is just the opposite of the motel <br /> traffic pattern. Nelson said Everest would be willing to supply the appropriate signing for the <br /> streets in order to minimize traffic congestion. The plat has already been approve' billing <br /> four existing legal parcels into one for the proposed site. Filing has not n p1.. on this yet <br /> because of the substantial park dedication fee that goes with • -velopm4W.Ir''site. <br /> Peterson noted that there were five main entrances for sus; ants. Nel were <br /> designed in a fashion that would allow two doors off of entran nee.''w4 € ; s_.ed = <br /> building could be divided down into 5,000 square-foot bu ,•e° most like n . <br /> would be 10,000 square-foot. • <br /> Peterson asked for clarification in regard to the site's drivel `gym• • . with the car wash. <br /> Nelson said the driveway was moved to its current loc.f•on, as • • ' e plan, so it matches <br /> up with one of the driveways of the car wash rather , ave two e This shouldn't be a <br /> conflict. He added before the plan gets to the est wourd;re, ew the driveway <br /> locations and adjust any conflict that may oc« xU J N <br /> Ericson said a lighting plan had been su•;e tted anep' did requirements. <br /> Peterson asked for a description o 4 e ••r< all syst:..r located between the proposed • <br /> building site and the adjacent C.r site. son • • <'e retaining wall system, a Keystone <br /> product, w. described in d $& e civil._ , '`project. There are also retaining walls <br /> along the no ;• ide of th. • • $ >, he ad. - <br /> Miller aske• or •cation • • snow storage. Nelson said the site did not have a lot of <br /> room for snow`$ Drag -: • ccurntiraWPTin. will have to be removed from the site and relocated, <br /> Nelson said. Trai ilii..‘- :andle•: Q umpsters located inside of the building. Pick-ups and <br /> deliveries can„ge andlec t _,ade-'--vel entries located at various sites in the building. This' <br /> Al- •_,• • . • .. •. _3: it*.• - • - . - .. - ■ . n • •'.• . • - . . . . . - _se <br /> said ,,, <br /> Paingratios were discussed and deemed acceptable by the Commission. Nelson said the <br /> parking in the busine s,!:;'park had been designed for the highest range of tenant use and was flexible <br /> i terms of acco .• ating changing parking needs. <br /> 4 '�<�r�”"moi.; <br /> Nfliit item No. 2 of the Resolution stipulations would be eliminated. Obert said it was <br /> his opinion that the stipulation should remain as part of the Resolution. Miller said there are <br /> different office requirements in regard to parking. Nelson agreed that the market will self-correct <br /> the parking needs of each individual site. In this particular case, the site is engineered for 5 stalls <br /> per thousand which is almost 100 percent of the requirement in most suburbs. Ericson said staff • <br /> would be comfortable omitting stipulation item No. 2 from the resolution. <br />