Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission March 3, 1999 <br /> Regular Meeting Page 2 4, <br /> b. February 3, 1999 <br /> Stevenson/Berke to approve the minutes of January 26, 1999 and February 3, 199 ,t. amended. <br /> Ayes - 7 Nays - 0 <br /> 06, <br /> Motion Carried. <br /> s <br /> 5. <br /> Discussion of Planning Commission Bylaws. <br /> Mr. Ericson reviewed the Planning Commission Byl wsanoting the< [ ° r ade at the Planning <br /> g p . change ,` s . ere recommended. <br /> Commission's last meeting. Mr. Ericson review,,,,$�<�.=z <br /> He began by stating, that to be consistent wit _ 'rt*-'‘ of call' gto order the first and <br /> third Wednesdays of the month, the third qiiting ofi,156.4° :: : i fad previously been an <br /> Agenda Session was revised to say"re: • meeti .M . He'. : ®: :filed that the section requiring a <br /> certain structure for the Planning CoWsion motes was : moved. He further explained that a <br /> "minutes policy" would be on file 'AV' o ¢ 'ty Dev l';pment Department that could be <br /> reviewed on an annual basis or a ?-ded. ricson5 iewed other revisions which included <br /> special meeti s and that the,,c e ® s � <br /> p <g d be call• tri to the two regular meeting as needed <br /> and that a I da sessio a condu -adjournment of a regular meeting. He noted <br /> : <br /> that a r-.'. ing sc " ,„ V:\ <br /> been p tied in the packet. <br /> .t4;.3."3, <br /> Commissioners> conc- L... ..;the section addressing election and terms. The <br /> Planning Co w,. sed w or not the practice of appointing the Chair in December <br /> and the Vi ;``; as appropriate. It was the consensus of the Commission to <br /> han:a r-'s so that reco Th & .4 ,,n to the Cit Council of the Chair would also occur in Janua . <br /> Th °=ommission also exl,es .,d some concern with the statement that"the City Council should <br /> r pplications for P<:_ o'ning Commission appointments to the Planning Commission for <br /> Q l o mendations pr o taking action to fill vacancies" and decided to remove this statement <br /> toftpfijiBylaws .:-,Ce e Planning Commission also recommended that Chapter 401.02 of the <br /> m o .. ` .O ould be added as a reference in addition to the section already noted, 401.03. <br /> The Commission briefly discussed videotaping of meetings and whether or not preserving the <br /> video tapes were required. Associate Ericson informed the Commission that the City is not <br /> required by law to video tape the meetings and reported that although the video tapes will be kept <br /> on file, the minutes of the meeting are required to be kept on file and would be used in any court <br /> or legal actions if necessary. • <br />