My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-22-2000
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Economic Development Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
06-22-2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/23/2022 12:44:10 PM
Creation date
8/1/2018 8:27:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV EDC
EDC Document Type
Packets
Date
6/22/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Item No. 613 <br />Meeting Date: June 22nd, 2000 <br />Type of Business: EB <br />EB: EDC Business <br />IN: Informational Item <br />Citv of Mounds View Staff Re <br />To: Economic Development Commission <br />From: Aaron Parrish, Economic Development Coordinator <br />Item Title/Subject: Tax Abatement Finance Policy <br />Date of Report: June 14, 2000 <br />Background: <br />At the March 13th meeting of the Economic Development Authority, the Authority gave direction to the <br />EDC to examine the potential use of tax abatement in Mounds View, and to develop a tax abatement <br />policy. The proceeding paragraphs provide a detailed overview of what is commonly referred to as tax <br />abatement. <br />Realizing the need for a viable alternative to tax increment finance, the 1997 Minnesota Legislature <br />and Governor adopted tax abatement legislation into law. "The laws goal was to give each taxing <br />jurisdiction a voice in economic and redevelopment efforts, limit the state's financial liability through the <br />school finance system, and enable new business retention efforts" (Bubul et al 3). While tax <br />abatements have not been widely adopted at this point, it is anticipated the use of this development <br />finance tool will increase in the future as TIF becomes more restrictive. <br />Operational Considerations <br />It must be noted that "Abatement, in the context of Minnesota's abatement law, is not an abatement in <br />the literal sense of the word. In reality, what Minnesota law contemplates is a tax rebate rather than an <br />exemption from paving taxes. When a jurisdiction enters into an abatement agreement, the taxpayer <br />pays taxes on the abated property to the county in the same manner it would if the taxes were not <br />being abated. The county then pays the abatement to the general fund of the political subdivision" <br />(Bubul et al 3). Accordingly, the term tax abatement is somewhat misleading. <br />Tax increment finance allows municipalities and local economic development authorities to capture the <br />tax base from the three primary taxing jurisdictions. As previously indicated, tax abatements are <br />granted by particular political subdivisions. A political subdivision may grant an abatement if: <br />" (a) it expects the benefits to the political subdivision of the proposed abatement agreement to at least <br />equal the costs to the political subdivision of the proposed agreement; and <br />(b) it finds that doing so is in the public interest because it will: <br />(1) increase or preserve tax base; <br />(2) provide employment opportunities in the political subdivision; <br />(3) provide or help acquire or construct public facilities; <br />(4) help redevelop or renew blighted areas; <br />(5) help provide access to services for residents of the political subdivision; or <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.