My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2005/08/08
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
Agenda Packets - 2005/08/08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:49:27 PM
Creation date
8/1/2018 8:28:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
8/8/2005
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
8/8/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
113
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Arndt Subd. Report <br />August 8, 2005 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />Park Dedication Requirements <br /> <br />Every subdivision of land is subject to park dedication requirements. The City Code in Chapter <br />1202 indicates that up to 10 percent of the land value be dedicated to the City to help offset <br />future park impacts associated with the development of land. The Fairchild property is valued at <br />$4.42 per square foot. Two new homes will be constructed as a result of this subdivision, yet <br />one of the homes replaces an existing home and thus should not be subject to the dedication. <br />The land value of the smaller of the two lots to be created (Tract A) would be $56,700. Ten <br />percent of that value--$5,670--would represent the maximum park dedication fee. On minor <br />subdivisions such as this, the Council has assessed a 5% park dedication fee, as can be seen <br />on the Park Dedication Fee Summary exhibit attached to this report. If the Council supports a <br />5% dedication, that fee would be $2,835. A five percent fee would be consistent with previous <br />subdivisions and reasonable given the additional impact to the City’s park system. <br /> <br />Easements <br /> <br />With every subdivision of land, the City requires that drainage and utility easements be <br />dedicated around the perimeter of the lot. The Certificate of Survey provided by the applicants <br />indicates the presence of two existing utility easements and an easement along the front of <br />Fairchild Avenue for right of way purposes. The two new lots fronting Fairchild Avenue will <br />need to provide five-foot side yard and 10 foot front and rear yard utility easements. Staff will <br />prepare these documents with descriptions provided by the applicant’s surveyor. One of the <br />existing easements will need to be vacated—the five-foot strip that runs along the east five feet <br />of the south 85.5 feet of 8084 Fairchild Avenue. Vacation of easements is accomplished by <br />ordinance. That ordinance would be prepared subject to the Council’s approval of the <br />subdivision. <br /> <br />Technical Issues <br /> <br />The Certificate of Plat and Survey provided by the applicants has been reviewed by the City <br />Attorney and found to include some measurement discrepancies. To ensure the certificate of <br />survey will be recordable, staff forwarded the certificate of survey to the Ramsey County <br />surveyor’s office for their review and approval. The City’s approval will be contingent upon the <br />County’s acceptance. With subdivisions of land, the City requires that title commitments be <br />prepared for the affected lots to ensure all persons and parties having an interest in the <br />properties are represented on the transfer documentation. The applicants have provided a Title <br />commitment for the Sherwood Road parcel however a commitment will also need to be <br />provided for the parcel on Fairchild Avenue. <br /> <br />Planning Commission Action <br /> <br />The Planning Commission reviewed this request at their meeting on July 20, 2005 and found <br />that the request satisfies all zoning and subdivision requirements. The Commission considered <br />the fact that there is a house on the site presently and suggested the existing home and <br />associated outbuildings could remain until the new home was constructed, or for one year, <br />whichever occurs first. Their recommendation of approval is attached for the Council’s <br />reference. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.