My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-21-1999
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
04-21-1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2018 8:30:42 AM
Creation date
8/1/2018 8:29:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
4/21/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission April 7 1999 <br /> Regular Meeting Page 5 <br /> III <br /> Chair Peterson opened the public hearing at 7:18 p.m. <br /> Hearing no pubic input, Chair Peterson closed the public hearing at 7:18 p.m. <br /> Chair Peterson stated it appears there is unanimous consent among the *sin •irect staff to <br /> prepare a resolution approving Planning Case No. 550-99, 531,2 Raym• °<:. tie, for a reduced <br /> side yard setback variance to allow for the construction of 1 t paC"AraDna eet of the side <br /> property line. '. <br /> > ` . <br /> i <br /> 6. Planning Case No. 549-99 :z:�' ;.:� 8 ic Meeting] <br /> Properties Involved: 2791 Highway 10 ~ <br /> Consideration of a Variance Request to Install a 16-Fo• all, 4 >. oot Advertising Sign <br /> on Their Property Facing Highway 10 <br /> Applicant: KinderCare (Jones Sign Company, I ' <br /> V <br /> Planning Associate Ericson gave the sta VA eport a, allows. <br /> III .,,,;, <br /> The applicant, Jones Sign Compa : _ ,. rep =nting th 'nderCare Learning Center, is <br /> requesting a variance from the Si v:, ode to . w for -,nstallation of a pylon advertising sign <br /> at KinderCar located at 27•.• way 10 TAi `e". y, even though it supports a commercial <br /> use, is zo mit" . mediuff�t' - resident.: g S •asis for this zoning is that day care facilities <br /> such as `' trig were -i=!1,0:41,4„ allowe. in commercial districts. This restriction was <br /> eliminated ,sing o , - 595 in 1997, which allowed as conditional uses day care <br /> facilities in all $ •s and ins �' t , ;;` <br /> 4, 'ng districts. Were the property zoned commercial, it <br /> could have u.,, , .$ 1 ` eet o •fined permanent signage. The current proposal would <br /> add a 16- • � a , A: -: ` • 11•t pylon sign to the existing 36 square-foot wall sign. Together <br /> the am,: ,,,,e' <br /> of signage i.p $ .low the maximum allowed 100 square feet. <br /> nv <br /> • <br /> E ion stated if the pro <br /> a ywere zoned appropriately for a day care, they would be allowed to <br /> h '4a ignage in the an”i` <br /> t being requested. This is the basis for staff's determination that a <br /> '$ ; '• exists. He each of the seven criteria established for consideration of a variance and <br /> v; .:l sis •,,, «� criteria. He noted that a variance may only be granted in those cases <br /> ' l� &• poses undue hardship or practical difficulties to the property owner. <br /> a.. <br /> Ericson indicated that a hardship clearly exists in this case. He advised that staff sent out public <br /> hearing notices to all properties within 350 feet of the KinderCare property. Of the 19 properties <br /> affected, only 12 are developed residentially. All of the others are developed commercially with <br /> the exception of Church on the Rock and a vacant parcel on the south side of Highway 10. Staff <br /> IIIhas received a call from Western Bank indicated they do not support the variance request. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.