My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-21-1999
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
04-21-1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2018 8:30:42 AM
Creation date
8/1/2018 8:29:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
4/21/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission April 7, 1999 <br /> Regular Meeting Page 6 <br /> • <br /> Ericson stated staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Resolution 575-99 <br /> approving a variance from Chapter 1008 of the Municipal Code pertaining to signage to allow a <br /> permanent, freestanding pylon sign at 2791 Highway 10, KinderCare Learning Center. <br /> Chair Peterson opened the public hearing at 7:18 p.m. <br /> Charles Durand, Holiday Stationstore, 2744 Highway 10, , , if tW "r a KinderCare <br /> sign or a sign that will be used to advertise other activitie °' cson ad • -' $ y advertise <br /> KinderCare, not other activities. tM <br /> Commissioner Stevenson noted the size of the sign is fo` >: ,,. ,:,f welve feet. He" ': .. ,1-i"'at the <br /> Highway 10 right-of-way is a total of 200 from side-to-strattg ,ould bequite close to the <br /> KinderCare fence. Ericson stated he is not sure of the e r:77-11iV,`,: i:rn's\,..-'$ the property line. <br /> Stevenson noted if the proposed trailways are constp, they wr $ 8 >s be located quite <br /> close to the fence line. Ericson stated the sign s- g to 15 fe. , the property line, <br /> which should place the sign outside of the tr. �? <br /> Commissioner Miller noted one of the o• ctions ry WelitilIfis the size of the sign so, <br /> perhaps, they do not know the actua of the n. <br /> Commissioner Kaden noted the r-'• `'ential zoiit g and . d if this will establish an adverse <br /> precedent. 'cson stated t s e only d' gff • ercial operation in a residential district <br /> that he is .. s•f. Fro 4.54113W ! rspecti g no danger of establishing a precedent. <br /> Kaden ask 7 •perty g a.time, been zoned commercial. Ericson stated he believes <br /> it has always •vatigiatt,<;esiden <br /> Commissi. a << m ` - oul se rezoned. Ericson stated it could be. <br /> e), <br /> Co ' sioner Johnson aA �:Y§out the tax impact should this property be rezoned as <br /> co• p ercial. Ericson st. • t e applicant did not set out to derive any special tax benefit and, in <br /> f. : e City establishe e zoning district. <br /> a'oner enquired regarding the hours the sign would be lit. Stevenson stated this <br /> t shed light and appears to be a light from within the sign. <br /> Chair Peterson noted the sign material is not very translucent so he doubts there would be any <br /> illumination reaching the ground. <br /> Commissioner Kaden asked if any nearby residents commented on the lighting. Ericson stated no <br /> comments were received. • <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.