Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission April 7, 1999 <br /> Regular Meeting Page 7 <br /> Chair Peterson stated he is unaware of the City setting hours of operation for such a sign. <br /> Commissioner Stevenson stated lighting times are usually only restricted if a ground-mounted <br /> spotlight illuminates a pylon-type of sign. <br /> Commissioner Hegland asked why a variance was requested r. her tha •. g. Ericson <br /> stated the applicant submitted a building permit unaware th.. . gn w $ `5 allowed. He <br /> explained that a variance application costs less and is mor •edient t • 'Vii $ $>• which <br /> involves the adoption of an ordinance which requires a mum of City m $$-eti <br /> Hegland stated it appears the problem is that KinderCargo'" w. $+ting to run a co $ . <br /> business on residentially-zoned property. He stated it seems ` •propriate to rezone the <br /> property to the actual use. <br /> Ericson suggested this issue be addressed while the i$ •rehensiv:41441%,-,ng considered. <br /> Commissioner Miller noted a day care can b $' --irotssvN,vntiai d:erty. Ericson stated <br /> that is correct and the property would not .d to <br /> Chair Peterson noted at the time of .s ction, ere was s a ternative so it may be a little <br /> • :, <br /> harsh to force a rezoning at this pq $ jtime. stated i.t� ay be more appropriate to consider a <br /> rezoning during discussion of th- _:s prehe& e. air e PlanPeterson commented on the <br /> importance o signage for a •` $��-rcial bu ;'�;� �:$,t,ated his support to consider the variance <br /> request. <br /> nrt 51%Commissio aske $N,': .e to this property is proposed in the future <br /> Com rehensiv: • <br /> Commissi a.='n :Joh:. his eipy of the Comprehensive Plan and advised it is identified <br /> as Co nity Comme ;5• <br /> ° <br /> tr <br /> He< >k g no additional p i`put, Chair Peterson closed the public hearing at 7:39 p.m. <br /> ,' •ssioner Laub- 4ted he would want to be assured the placement of this signage does not <br /> $ th pla $` t of the trailway. Ericson advised that the trailway would not need to <br /> $ $ roe$ • e setback. <br /> Commissioner Stevenson stated this is correct and when the highway is turned back some of the <br /> 100 feet will be brought in closer by means of the trailway, narrowing the current image of <br /> Highway 10. He stated his concerns are well addressed that the sign will not result in a conflict <br /> with the trailway. <br /> 110 Chair Peterson concurred. <br />