Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council August 8, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 15 <br /> <br />interpretation of where they were putting the funds. She stated that they have more than enough 1 <br />of the funding issues available to cover it and could leave it in the TIF funds if they wanted to 2 <br />and at this point this would be a good direction for Staff if paying this is a legitimate concern. 3 <br /> 4 <br />City Administrator Ulrich explained that it had become an accounting problem with respect to 5 <br />the time spent over the last couple of years. 6 <br /> 7 <br />Mayor Marty confirmed noting that the more they could transfer under that, as it was pointed out 8 <br />to them earlier, that with the amount in the TIF pool, if this keeps building the City might have to 9 <br />start paying some out. 10 <br /> 11 <br />Council Member Thomas stated that this is not enough of a concern to her to justify moving that 12 <br />to the General Fund. She stated that she believes these are legitimate expenses in the TIF 13 <br />District, which is why they have administrative fees with TIF Districts. She stated that she 14 <br />believes it is entirely appropriate to leave those personnel costs, for the moment, within the TIF 15 <br />funds. 16 <br /> 17 <br />Mayor Marty explained that when he spoke with Mr. Hansen about the funds, one of his concerns 18 <br />was with the accountability in reporting, which is where this probably came from. 19 <br /> 20 <br />Council Member Gunn explained that her concern with this is that as they go through 21 <br />decertifying the TIF Districts, the City does not get hit all of a sudden with three salaries that 22 <br />would have to come completely out of the General Fund. She suggested gradually working 23 <br />through this little by little so that the City is not hit with the entire amount all at once. 24 <br /> 25 <br />Mayor Marty acknowledged her concerns and suggested discussing this issue as part of next 26 <br />year’s budget discussion. He noted that the Council has a special work session scheduled for 27 <br />next Monday at 7:00 p.m. to specifically discuss these issues. 28 <br /> 29 <br />C. Resolution 6585 Approving a Severance Package for Regular Full-time Golf 30 <br />Course Employees. 31 <br /> 32 <br />City Administrator Ulrich stated that this item was discussed at the City Council Special Work 33 <br />Session on July 5, 2005 and at that time it was the consensus of the Council to allow the normal 34 <br />vacation, sick leave payouts in accordance with City policy and to allow accumulated flex time to 35 <br />be paid out, over time, to each of the golf course employees impacted. He stated that currently 36 <br />there are three fulltime, permanent employees at the golf course. He explained that flex time was 37 <br />the vehicle used to account for the overtime hours the employees work during the summer that 38 <br />are carried over into the winter. He explained that the employees normally work extra hours 39 <br />during the summer and are paid, via flextime, during the winter months in order to remain on the 40 <br />payroll as full-time, year-round employees. He stated that currently the City does not have any 41 <br />special severance pay provisions for economic layoff noting that the last time this was discussed 42 <br />he had proposed a one-week, per year of service severance provision and the Council, at the time, 43 <br />wanted more time to consider the proposal. He stated that the Resolution, as presented, outlines 44 <br />the severance package and consists of the normal severance provisions of sick leave and vacation 45