06-02-1999 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

s Mounds View Planning Commission May 19, 1999 • Regular Meeting Page 2 Commissioner Miller stated that the minutes had been reviewed at the last meeting, and a few very minor corrections had been made. 30 MOTION/SECOND: Miller/Hegland to approve the April 21, 1999 mee. !g miy. tes as corrected. Ayes—6 Nays—0 t otion carried. Alv Ar 5. Planning Case No. 553-99 .. 'Public Ilea<: "?< :.1 4,4..,,,, Property Involved: 7386 Parkview Terrace .- Consideration of a variance request for a reduced side y4r 'se4 ,x,. r .three-season porch Applicant: Mike& Sandy Leon �, .`..,. The applicant was present `Plannin Associate Ericson gave the sta leport flows: , • The applicants,Mike and Sandy Le _0f! eque ng a vari dee from the required ten-foot side yard setback established for principal sings a,§zt. ing s.a_;- therein. They would like to replace and existing 10 2 square foo .c'` rth a t '1-,;7-':: ""1 *orch of the same size in the same location. .3 ... (.,':, The dec as exis -Ail. :-r const , e house, is five feet from the north side of the propert4'l'- > °z_< !uire a '> two foot side yard setback. k`. The subject pr : ,,cated i :,%4 ' er Lake Woods single family hoe development at the northeast co ,:' W ,0: , o,ad u '4 Silver Lake Road. The home, whichmfaces east, is one of many in t R evelop Y #; ve street at the front (Parkview Terrace) and back (Silver Lake Road) $ �.-e property. F_} &. k`- of this property is only 9,150 square feet. t , E ' n noted for the Pl. ` ing Commission to act favorably on a variance application, the Planning - > 'scion must find„0 emonstrated hardship or practical difficulty associated with the property iiiiik akes a literal.;rrpretation of the Code overly burdensome or even restrictive to a property tatp t..:;es require that the governing body review a. set of specified criteria for each a -:. ,,. "g ` ake its decision in accordance with these criteria as set forth in Section 1125.02, Su• <' ":i , of the City Code. He noted the Code clearly states that a hardship exists when all of the criteria are met. Ericson noted this lot was approved in 1985 as part of the Silver Lake Woods Second Addition subdivision and in conjunction with the Silver Lake Woods Planned Unit Development (PUD) • agreement. While density bonuses and reductions in frontage requirements were given to the