My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-02-1999
MoundsView
>
City Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
06-02-1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2018 8:44:29 AM
Creation date
8/1/2018 8:42:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
6/2/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Mounds View Planning Commission May 19, 1999 <br /> Regular Meeting Page 3 <br /> development to allow for substandard lots, no mention is made in the documentation about allowance <br /> for reduced setbacks. <br /> AV <br /> Ericson reviewed the seven criteria which must be considered and stated gax aft- ch analysis, it <br /> appears to staff that in this case there is no hardship, unless th- Planni 1r �:� .: :$sion were to take <br /> into consideration that the lot area is substandard. (The lot ',,,:'-, .;feet v ;l;l °:'<. : .:„feet deep, for an <br /> area of 9,150 square feet, substantially less than the requir :._ _ 1,000 s u 4� e" :- 'red.) Yet,” <br /> width of the property, at 75 feet, does comply with the Codi:," spot*p y .wand it is Ater pot ;wid Griot <br /> depth or area, which is basis for this variance. k;. • :` <br /> Ericson outlined the criteria as follows: :; .4 <br /> 44-litbaffiet, <br /> a. Exceptional or extraordinary circumstances <br /> ply to", . �� . � <br /> � � ty which do not apply <br /> generally to other properties in the same zones.�, icinity a.; .. ;,l,om lot size or shape, <br /> topography or other circumstances over which : :;ers of t 'eprperty since the effective <br /> date hereof have had no control. ` '` " `= ,E <br /> Ericson stated that he could no :4 iscerny except y c rcumstances applicable to this <br /> IIIproperty. <br /> b. The literal interpretation o .:, e provist`:`. of this thi4i e would deprive the applicant of rights <br /> com slily enjoyed b:. .t - proper* n*` e district under the terms of this Title. <br /> : `° � -dtha �i , `. : eral interp - ation of the Code would not prohibit the property <br /> Y <br /> owt 'nstrue't `. : s <br /> it could only be 7 feet in depth. <br /> lalitilL: -ftcyoger, <br /> c. That th- •. 'tions or`c instances do not result from the actions of the applicant. <br /> cson stated t : ii i. :_; 'ance request is the result of the applicant's desire to construct a <br /> ee-season por: <br /> ` <br /> d• That granting t °agriance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege <br /> obit that is denie O fy this Title to owners of other lands, structures or buildings in the same <br /> :; <br /> :aa ,Strict. <br /> ENOW <br /> '``` .<. ; : n stated that three-season porches are allowed in this district, but not all property <br /> owners have room to accommodate them. He stated that this is a desirable improvement, and <br /> that in the past, the Planning Commission has approved variances to allow for living space <br /> conditions. He stated that staff should determine whether or not this particular property met <br /> the same criteria as past properties. <br /> II <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.