My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-16-1999
MoundsView
>
City Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
06-16-1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2018 8:49:05 AM
Creation date
8/1/2018 8:48:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
6/16/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br /> Mounds View Planning Commission June 2, 1999 <br /> • Regular Meeting Page 5 <br /> stated that all four units would have to exit the property in reverse,which could be a safety concern. <br /> He stated that these issues would be addressed and staff believed there were means to resolve them. <br /> Ericson referred to the Certificate of Survey, on-site plans, and a graphs *ispl•< tating that two <br /> areas of the Woodlawn Terrace Apartment complex encroach upon t • •roperty, near the <br /> southern end,toward Woodlawn Drive. He stated that Wo•, : Te = _ ,, e ster and parkin <br /> lot cross the lot line, which is in violation of the City Co e statedrt d be meet <br /> with the owner of the apartment complex to discuss this other iss art"'elan • vel. ent <br /> of the four-plex. <br /> Ericson stated that there were water and sewer lines in Wo• 've so utilities are available to <br /> the site. There are ten-foot drainage and utility easeme � rty's north and west sides <br /> which will more than likely serve as drainage areas fo i edev •• �ti e stated that he would <br /> be consulting with the City Attorney regarding a f � side y. a<and utility easement <br /> along the east lot line between the two vacant pr' ® �a •. vide for:10,Vonal drainage. He stated <br /> that the City typically requires that an ease•• •e • •r tha purpose. He noted that the <br /> easement would not be privately owne• t retai + • • e stated, however, that the <br /> developer could be required to mamta, F the ea ent � is would be addressed in his <br /> discussion with the City Attorney. <br /> Ericson summarized the issues . ated th ha•_• ed a resolution recommending approval <br /> of the devel' . ent review four-pl y ations. <br /> Mike J 114,11601vt, stai40,..1.A ad submitted the site plan changes as set forth in the second <br /> stipulation • 1g.',4 • ution <br /> Commissio if the s contained anything to address the parkingsituation on the <br /> Yt g <br /> northern piS unit <br /> ire stated that it 4 `eir intention to create two additional parking spaces in the northeast <br /> c•� of the site,but t •lans had not yet been redrawn. <br /> _ § ire, appli stated the end parking spaces will eliminate the back out movement. He <br /> s � �,, <br /> a � nsidering putting up signs and striping a no-parking zone in an attempt to <br /> a em of congestion. They will also have separate operating procedures as an adjunct <br /> to th=} se. <br /> Commissioner Miller asked about the composition of the exterior of the building. Mike Juaire stated <br /> that it was comprised of maintenance-free siding and steel doors. <br /> Chair Peterson asked if the building location on the lot could be adjusted. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.